中国卒中杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (09): 882-888.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2019.09.006

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2水平对颈动脉粥样硬化斑块及其稳定性预测价值的研究

申园,王丹丹,赵性泉   

  1. 100070 北京首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心;国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-22 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 赵性泉 zxq@vip.163.com
  • 基金资助:

    脑出血损伤机制与干预评价研究(2018YFC1312200)
    北京市医院管理局“登峰”人才培养计划(DFL20150501)
    神经系统重大疾病创新药物临床评价技术平台建设(2017ZX09304018)

Association between Serum Lipoprotein-associated Phospholipase A2 Level and Carotid Plaque Development and Vulnerability: a Cross-sectional Study

  • Received:2019-01-22 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-09-20

摘要:

目的 研究血清脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2(1ipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2,Lp-PLA2)水平对颈动 脉粥样硬化斑块及其稳定性的预测价值。 方法 本研究患者来源于无症状性多血管床狭窄的社区研究 (A s y m p t o m at i c P o l y v a s c u l a r Abnormalities Community,APAC)。检测入组患者血清Lp-PLA2水平,通过超声评估颈动脉粥样硬化斑块 特点。按照血清Lp-PLA2水平的四分位数,将受试者分为4组,用Logistic回归模型分析血清Lp-PLA2水 平与颈动脉粥样硬化斑块及斑块稳定性的关系。 结果 高Lp-PLA2水平(>159.1 ng/mL)是颈动脉不稳定斑块发生的预测因素(OR 2.8,95%CI 2.0~3.8,P <0.0001),在校正危险因素后,这种趋势没有发生变化(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.2~2.5,P= 0.0067),在<60岁受试者中,该差异仍然存在(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.1~2.7,P =0.0142),但在≥60岁受试 者中,其预测价值未达到统计学意义。 结论 较高血清Lp-PLA2水平是颈动脉不稳定粥样硬化斑块发生的预测因素,尤其在<60岁患者中。

文章导读: 本研究是基于大样本社区人群数据库的研究,发现高水平血清Lp-PLA2是颈动脉粥样硬化不稳定斑块的危险因素。

关键词: 脂蛋白相关磷脂酶A2; 颈动脉; 动脉粥样硬化斑块; 危险因素

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the association of serum total 1ipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) level with the vulnerability of atherosclerotic carotid plaques. Methods Data of this cohort study were from Asymptomatic Polyvascular Abnormalities Community (APAC) study, which was a cross-sectional study. The data of serum Lp-PLA2 level and ultrasonographic assessment of carotid plaques were extracted and analyzed. The participants were divided into 4 groups based on the quartile of serum total Lp-PLA2 level. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the serum total Lp-PLA2 level and carotid plaque development and vulnerability. Results A high Lp-PLA2 level (>159.1 ng/mL) was associated with carotid plaque vulnerability amongst the adults (OR 2.8, 95%CI 2.0-3.8, P <0.0001). After adjusting for the relevant risk factors, the tendency still existed (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.2-2.5, P =0.0067). For subjects aged <60 years old, the correlation between the two variates still existed (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.1-2.7, P =0.0142), while for subjects aged ≥60 years old, the difference of serum Lp-PLA2 level among the 4 groups had no statistical significance Conclusions An elevated serum Lp-PLA2 level was associated with carotid plaque vulnerability in adults, especially ones aged <60 years.

Key words: Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2; Carotid artery; Atherosclerosis plaque;Risk factor