Objective To investigate the effects of different manually assisted coughing (MAC) techniques on cough function, sputum clearance ability, and pulmonary function in patients with brainstem stroke, and to provide clinical evidence for the rehabilitation intervention of post-stroke cough dysfunction.
Methods A prospective randomized controlled design was used. Patients with brainstem stroke who were hospitalized at the Department of Sports Rehabilitation, Beijing Xiaotangshan Hospital from May 2023 to May 2024 were consecutively enrolled and randomly divided into the diaphragmatic stimulation group, the tracheal stimulation group, and the tongue root stimulation group. All three groups received routine rehabilitation therapy and respiratory training. On this basis, each group received diaphragm stimulation, tracheal stimulation, or tongue root stimulation, respectively. The intervention was performed twice daily, 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 2 consecutive weeks. Before and after intervention, peak cough flow (PCF) was measured using a pulmonary function tester, and 24-hour sputum volume was recorded. Static pulmonary function indices, including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and peak expiratory flow (PEF), were tested using a cardiopulmonary exercise testing system. Ultrasonic examination was used to evaluate diaphragmatic parameters, including diaphragm thickness at end of inspiration (TEI), diaphragm thickness at end of expiration (TEE), diaphragm thickness fraction (DTF), and diaphragmatic mobility (DM). The incidence of pneumonia after intervention was recorded.
Results A total of 33 patients with brainstem stroke were enrolled, with 11 patients in each group. After intervention, PCF, FVC, FEV1, PEF, TEI, TEE, and DTF were significantly increased, and 24-hour sputum volume was significantly decreased in all three groups compared with those before intervention (P<0.05). Pairwise comparisons between groups after intervention showed that the tongue root stimulation group achieved greater improvement in 24-hour sputum volume than the diaphragmatic stimulation group [(35.64±10.71) mL vs. (46.09±9.52) mL, P=0.025]. FVC, FEV1, and PEF in the tongue root stimulation group and the tracheal stimulation group were better than those in the diaphragmatic stimulation group (all P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in PCF, TEI, TEE, and DTF among the three groups after intervention. The incidence of pneumonia after intervention was 36.4% in the diaphragmatic stimulation group, 18.2% in the tracheal stimulation group, and 9.1% in the tongue root stimulation group, with no statistically significant difference among groups (P=0.439).
Conclusions Diaphragmatic stimulation, tracheal stimulation, and tongue root stimulation— three MAC techniques—all effectively improve cough function, pulmonary function, and sputum clearance in patients with brainstem stroke. Tongue root stimulation yields superior effects in eliciting cough reflex and promoting sputum excretion.