上肢动作研究测试量表评定亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的信效度和敏感性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2024.08.009

中国卒中杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (8): 915-923.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2024.08.009

上肢动作研究测试量表评定亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的信效度和敏感性研究

吴娱倩¹，张玉梅¹，臧大维^1，2，3，范小伟⁴，王安心^2，3，张晓丽^2，3，孟霞^2，3

1北京 100070首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院康复医学科

2国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心
3首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心
4首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经精神与临床心理科

收稿日期:2023-05-29 出版日期:2024-08-20 发布日期:2024-08-20
通讯作者: 孟霞mengxia45@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目（82071295；82072532）

Study on the Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of Action Research Arm Test Scale in Evaluating the Function of Hemiplegic Upper Limb and Hand in Subacute Stage Ischemic Stroke Patients

WU Yuqian¹, ZHANG Yumei¹, ZANG Dawei^1,2,3, FAN Xiaowei⁴, WANG Anxin2^,3, ZHANG Xiaoli^2,3, MENG Xia^2,3

1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China; 2China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100070, China; 3Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China; 4Department of Neuropsychiatry & Clinical Psychology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China

Received:2023-05-29 Online:2024-08-20 Published:2024-08-20
Contact: MENG Xia, E-mail: mengxia45@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨上肢动作研究测试（action research arm test，ARAT）量表应用于亚急性期缺血性卒中患者上肢及手功能障碍评定的效度、信度和敏感性。

方法本研究招募2020年1月—2022年5月于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院等17家医院住院的300例缺血性卒中患者，并由两名评定者分别对受试者进行ARAT量表评估。同时以Fugl-Meyer运动功能评定量表上肢部分（Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity，FMA-UE）作为效标。分别采用Spearman相关分析及验证性因子分析评价ARAT量表的效标效度及结构效度；采用Cronbach’s α系数及组内相关系数评价ARAT量表的内部信度、敏感性及外部信度。

结果以FMA-UE为效标，ARAT量表总分与其总分呈正相关（r=0.946，P<0.001）。结构效度检验中，验证性因子分析结果表明：因子间相关系数范围为0.79～0.92，模型整体拟合指标为χ2/df=7.011，P=0.001，比较拟合指数=0.906，增值拟合指数=0.907，规范拟合指数=0.895，近似误差均方
根=0.055。各因子的组合信度值在0.964～0.983，各因子的平均变异抽取量在0.940～0.952。内部一致性检验中，评分等级的Cronbach’s α系数为0.987，敏感性分析中，Cronbach’s α系数在0.986～0.987。外部一致性检验中，两名评定者间的组内相关系数最高为0.999，95%CI集中于0.961～0.999。

结论 ARAT量表具有良好的效标效度、结构效度、信度和敏感性，适用于亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的评估。

文章导读： 上肢动作研究测试量表具有良好的信度和效度，适用于亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的评估。

关键词: 缺血性卒中; 上肢功能; 手功能; 效标效度; 结构效度; 信度; 敏感性; 上肢动作研究测试量表

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of the action research arm test (ARAT) scale in evaluating the function of hemiplegic upper limb and hand in subacute stage ischemic stroke patients.

Methods In this study, 300 patients with ischemic stroke admitted to 17 hospitals including Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2020 to May 2022 were recruited. The ARAT scale was used to assess all the patients by two evaluators, independently. The Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity (FMA-UE) scale was taken as the criterion. The Spearman correlation analysis and the confirmatory factor analysis were used to evaluate the criterion validity and construct validity of the ARAT scale, respectively. The Cronbach’s α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient analysis were used to evaluate the internal reliability, sensitivity, and external reliability of the ARAT scale.

Results With FMA-UE as the criterion, the FMA-UE total score was positively correlated with the ARAT total score (r=0.946, P<0.001). To evaluate the construct validity, the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between the factors ranged from 0.79 to 0.92, the overall fitting index of the model was χ2/df=7.011, P=0.001, the comparative fit index=0.906, the incremental fix index=0.907, the normed fit index=0.895, and the root mean square error of approximation=0.055. The combined reliability values of each factor ranged from 0.964 to 0.983, and the average amount of variation of each factor ranged from 0.940 to 0.952. In the internal consistency test, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of grade score was 0.987, and the Cronbach’s α coefficient ranged from 0.986 to 0.987 in the sensitivity analysis. In the external consistency test, the highest intraclass correlation coefficient between the two evaluators was 0.999, and the 95%CI was concentrated between 0.961 and 0.999.

Conclusions ARAT scale has good criterion validity, construct validity, reliability, and sensitivity, which is suitable for evaluating the function of hemiplegic upper limb and hand in subacute stage ischemic stroke patients.

Key words: Ischemic stroke; Upper limb function; Hand function; Criterion validity; Construct validity; Reliability; Sensitivity; Action research arm test scale

中图分类号:

吴娱倩, 张玉梅, 臧大维, 范小伟, 王安心, 张晓丽, 孟霞.

上肢动作研究测试量表评定亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的信效度和敏感性研究 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 915-923.

WU Yuqian, ZHANG Yumei, ZANG Dawei, FAN Xiaowei, WANG Anxin, ZHANG Xiaoli, MENG Xia.

Study on the Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of Action Research Arm Test Scale in Evaluating the Function of Hemiplegic Upper Limb and Hand in Subacute Stage Ischemic Stroke Patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2024, 19(8): 915-923.

参考文献

[1] AMANO S，UMEJI A，TAKEBAYASHI T，et al. Clinimetric properties of the shortened Fugl-Meyer assessment for the assessment of arm motor function in hemiparetic patients after stroke[J]. Top Stroke Rehabil，2020，27（4）：290-295.

[2] KIM T L，HWANG S H，LEE W J，et al. The Korean version of the Fugl-Meyer assessment：reliability and validity evaluation[J]. Ann Rehabil Med，2021，45（2）：83-98.

[3] FUGL-MEYER A R，JÄÄSKÖ L，LEYMAN I，et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient.Ⅰ. A method for evaluation of physical performance[J]. Scand J Rehabil Med，1975，7（1）：13-31.

[4] JORDAN H T，CHE J，BYBLOW W D，et al. Fast outcome categorization of the upper limb after stroke[J]. Stroke，2022，53（2）：578-585.

[5] LYLE R C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research[J]. Int J Rehabil Res，1981，4（4）：483-492.

[6] REMSIK A B，WILLIAMS L，Jr，GJINI K，et al. Ipsilesional mu rhythm desynchronization and changes in motor behavior following post stroke BCI intervention for motor rehabilitation[J/OL]. Front Neurosci，2019，13：53[2023-05-07]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00053.

[7] 赵江莉，毛玉瑢，徐智勤，等. 中文版上肢动作研究量表在早期脑梗死患者中的效度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践，2019，25（8）：946-955.

ZHAO J L，MAO Y R，XU Z Q，et al. Validity of Chinese version of action research arm test in patients with early cerebral infarction[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract，2019，25（8）：946-955.

[8] ZHAO J L，CHEN P M，LI W F，et al. Translation and initial validation of the Chinese version of the action research arm test in people with stroke[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int，2019，2019：5416560[2023-05-07]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5416560.

[9] WILSON N，HOWEL D，BOSOMWORTH H，et al. Analysing the action research arm test（ARAT）：a cautionary tale from the RATULS trial[J]. Int J Rehabil Res，2021，44（2）：166-169.

[10] FERNáNDEZ-SOLANA J，PARDO-HERNáNDEZ R，GONZáLEZ-BERNAL J J，et al. Psychometric properties of the action research arm test（ARAT）scale in post-stroke patients-Spanish population[J/OL].
Int J Environ Res Public Health，2022，19（22）：14918[2023-05-07]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214918.

[11] LIN K C，CHUANG L L，WU C Y，et al. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev，2010，47（6）：563-571.

[12] HSIEH Y W，WU C Y，LIN K C，et al. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation[J]. Stroke，2009，40（4）：1386-1391.

[13] AMANO S，UMEJI A，TAKAHASHI K，et al. Psychometric properties of the action research arm test using decision rules for skipping items in hemiparetic patients after stroke：a retrospective study[J]. Disabil Rehabil，2023，45（26）：4471-4477.

[14] 瓮长水，王军，潘小燕，等. 上肢动作研究量表在脑卒中患者中的效度[J]. 中国康复理论与实践，2008，14（1）：53-54.

WENG C S，WANG J，PAN X Y，et al. Validity of action research arm test in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract，2008，14（1）：53-54.

[15] 薛晶晶，危昔均，邹智，等. 上肢动作研究量表在慢性期脑卒中患者上肢运动功能评定中的信度、内在一致性及其与Wolf运动功能测试量表的相关性研究[C]//中国康复医学会. 中国康复医学会第八届全国康复治疗学术年会论文集.[出版地不详]：[出版者不详]，2011：70-71.

XUE J J，WEI X J，ZOU Z，et al. Reliability and internal consistency of the action research arm test in evaluating the function of upper limb in chronic stage stroke patients and its correlation with Wolf motor function test scale[C]//Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. Proceedings of the 8th national rehabilitation therapy academic conference of Chinese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine. [S. l.]：[s. n.]，2011：70-71.

[16] CHOO S X，BOSCH J，RICHARDSON J，et al. Reliability and validity of the shortened Singapore versions of the chedoke arm and hand activity inventory[J]. Int J Rehabil Res，2018，41（4）：297-303.

[17] 王燕.《脑卒中康复临床路径》（节选）英汉翻译实践报告[D]. 武汉：武汉工程大学，2023.

WANG Y. A report on the E-C translation of Clinical Pathways in Stroke Rehabilitation（excerpt）[D]. Wuhan：Wuhan Institute of Technology，2023.

[18] 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南撰写组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2010[J]. 中国全科医学，2011，14（35）：4013-4017.

Working Group on Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke，Cerebrovascular Group of Chinese Society of Neurology. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischeminc stroke 2010[J]. Chinese General Practice，2011，14（35）：4013-4017.

[19] 王荫华. 西方失语症成套测验（WAB）介绍（一）[J]. 中国康复理论与实践，1997（2）：87-89.

WANG Y H. Introduction to the western aphasia battery（WAB）[J]. Chin J Rehabil Theory Pract，1997（2）：87-89.

[20] LEE J Y，LEE D W，CHO S J，et al. Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic：validation of the Korean version of the Montreal cognitive assessment[J]. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol，2008，21（2）：104-110.

[21] 宋琼雅. 含有序分类变量的验证性因子分析模型：方法的比较与应用[D]. 广州：中山大学，2020.

SONG Q Y. Confirmatory factor analysis of ordered categorical variables：comparison and application of different estimation methods[D]. Guangzhou：Sun Yat-Sen University，2020.

[22] YOZBATIRAN N，DER-YEGHIAIAN L，CRAMER S C. A standardized approach to performing the action research arm test[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair，2008，22（1）：78-90.

[23] WOYTOWICZ E J，RIETSCHEL J C，GOODMAN R N，et al. Determining levels of upper extremity movement impairment by applying a cluster analysis to the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity in chronic stroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil，2017，98（3）：456-462.

[24] PRIPP A H. Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficients[J/OL]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen，2018，138（8）[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.18.0042.

[25] 张纳森，赵良渊. 基于结构方程模型的运动康复本科生胜任力模型的研究[J]. 中国卫生统计，2021，38（4）：542-545.

ZHANG N S，ZHAO L Y. Reaeaech on competency model of undergraduate students majoring in sports rehabilitation based on structural equation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics，2021，38（4）：542-545.

[26] PRANGE-LASONDER G B，ALT MURPHY M，LAMERS I，et al. European evidence-based recommendations for clinical assessment of upper limb in neurorehabilitation（CAULIN）：data synthesis from systematic reviews，clinical practice guidelines and expert consensus[J/OL]. J Neuroeng Rehabil，2021，18（1）：162[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-021-00951-y.

[27] AGUILERA-RUBIO á，CUESTA-GóMEZ A，MALLO-LóPEZ A，et al. Feasibility and efficacy of a virtual reality game-based upper extremity motor function rehabilitation therapy in patients with chronic stroke：a pilot study[J/OL]. Int J Environ Res Public Health，2022，19（6）：3381[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063381.

[28] ZHAO J L，ZHANG T，XU Z Q，et al. Responsiveness and predictive ability of the Chinese version of the action research arm test in people with cerebral infarction[J/OL]. Biomed Res Int，2019，2019：8270187[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8270187.

[29] CHEN P M，LIU T W，TSE M M Y，et al. The predictive role of hand section of Fugl-Meyer assessment and motor activity log in action research arm test in people with stroke[J/OL]. Front Neurol，2022，13：926130[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.926130.

[30] CHIN L F，HAYWARD K S，BRAUER S G. Factors influencing paretic upper limb use during first 4 weeks after stroke：a cross-sectional accelerometry study[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil，2021，100（2）：153-160.

[31] HOONHORST M H，NIJLAND R H，VAN DEN BERG J S，et al. How do Fugl-Meyer arm motor scores relate to dexterity according to the action research arm test at 6 months poststroke[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil，2015，96（10）：1845-1849.

[32] 张超，徐燕，陈平雁. 探索性因子分析与验证性因子分析在量表研究中的比较与应用[J]. 南方医科大学学报，2007，27（11）：1699-1700，1705.

ZHANG C，XU Y，CHEN P Y. Comparison and application of exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis in scale research[J]. J South Med Univ，2007，27（11）：1699-1700，1705.

[33] GRATTAN E S，VELOZO C A，SKIDMORE E R，et al. Interpreting action research arm test assessment scores to plan treatment[J]. OTJR（Thorofare N J），2019，39（1）：64-73.

[34] LIN J H，HSU M J，SHEU C F，et al. Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke[J]. Phys Ther，2009，89（8）：840-850.

[35] RODGERS H，BOSOMWORTH H，KREBS H I，et al. Robot assisted training for the upper limb after stroke（RATULS）：a multicentre randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet，2019，394（10192）：51-62.

[36] PADILLA-MAGAÑA J F，PEÑA-PITARCH E，SáNCHEZ-SUAREZ I，et al. Quantitative assessment of hand function in healthy subjects and post-stroke patients with the action research arm test[J/OL]. Sensors（Basel），2022，22（10）：3604[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103604.

[37] DROMERICK A W，GEED S，BARTH J，et al. Critical period after stroke study（CPASS）：a phase Ⅱ clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans[J/OL]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A，2021，118（39）：e2026676118[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026676118.

[38] BURTON Q，LEJEUNE T，DEHEM S，et al. Performing a shortened version of the action research arm test in immersive virtual reality to assess post-stroke upper limb activity[J/OL]. J Neuroeng Rehabil，2022，19（1）：133[2023-05-01]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-022-01114-3.

上肢动作研究测试量表评定亚急性期缺血性卒中患者偏瘫侧上肢及手功能的信效度和敏感性研究

Study on the Reliability, Validity, and Sensitivity of Action Research Arm Test Scale in Evaluating the Function of Hemiplegic Upper Limb and Hand in Subacute Stage Ischemic Stroke Patients

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张梦若, 徐守臣, 隋翠翠, 李玉奎, 王雪莉. 下肢康复机器人联合头针治疗对老年缺血性卒中患者步行效率和协调功能影响调查 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 902-908.
[2]	莫秋红, 丁晓波, 李靓, 张岩波, 李伟荣. 基于可解释性机器学习模型的轻型缺血性卒中复发预测研[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 924-930.
[3]	逯丹, 陈玮琪, 王雅平, 段婉莹, 郭蕾, 王玲, 刘丽萍, 徐安定, 王拥军, 中国卒中学会脑保护圆桌会学术委员会. 缺血性卒中脑细胞保护科学声明——来自中国卒中学会的科学声明 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 938-955.
[4]	李光硕, 赵性泉. 《中国急性缺血性卒中诊治指南2023》解读[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 956-961.
[5]	白磊鹏, 罗杰, 周思捷, 黄健辉, 梁铭钦, 赵庆顺. 肺叶楔形切除术后并发急性缺血性卒中行介入取栓治疗2例并文献回顾 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 962-966.
[6]	吴春艳, 朱新颖, 于文轩, 高云彬, 季丽丽, 战同霞, 谢海. 立德树人视域下脑血管病情景模拟案例教学效果评价问卷编制及信效度检验 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(8): 978-982.
[7]	赵岩, 姚婧鑫, 彭宇明. 老年开颅肿瘤切除患者围手术期同时并发缺血性卒中及脑出血报道 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(7): 797-802.
[8]	李彦江, 刘彤晖, 田惠, 孙岩, 张勇. 药物涂层球囊与普通球囊血管成形术治疗症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄的安全性和预后对比研究 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(7): 803-808.
[9]	伊珞, 姜英玉, 孟霞, 姜勇, 王拥军, 谷鸿秋. 轻型急性缺血性卒中患者院内神经功能恶化预测模型的开发与验证研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(5): 524-531.
[10]	郑国民, 梁志刚, 张振. 替罗非班联合机械取栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的研究进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(5): 573-578.
[11]	中国卒中学会医疗质量管理与促进分会, 《中国缺血性卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作患者血脂长期管理科学声明》编写组. 中国缺血性卒中及短暂性脑缺血发作患者血脂长期管理科学声明[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(4): 440-451.
[12]	郝曼均, 王利圆, 熊云云. 再灌注治疗的神经影像学评估[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(4): 459-467.
[13]	丁则昱, 李光硕, 赵性泉. 高水平空腹血糖与缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓后功能结局的关系分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(3): 293-298.
[14]	陈思嘉, 潘培炎, 陈思琪, 彭菲, 米东华. 普罗布考联合他汀类药物治疗颈动脉斑块的meta分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(3): 299-309.
[15]	闫喜格, 王国玲, 张博刚, 彭敏, 董中君, 申晓平, 陈秀晓, 贾倩, 董会格, 程莉. 急性颈动脉闭塞支架置入术后血管再闭塞补救性治疗方法——股-颈动脉转流术报道[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(3): 331-336.