五种院前卒中筛查量表对院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测价值

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2024.09.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨并分析5种院前卒中筛查量表对院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测价值。

方法回顾性纳入2015年1月—2022年12月，因非卒中相关疾病收入东台市人民医院并在住院期间因疑似卒中症状激活院内卒中绿色通道的所有患者。采用ROC曲线评估筛查量表对院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测价值。5种筛查量表分别为卒中现场评估和分类转运量表（field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination，FAST-ED）、快速动脉闭塞评估量表（rapid arterial occlusion evaluation，RACE）、洛杉矶运动量表（Los Angeles motor scale，LAMS）、辛辛那提院前卒中严重程度量表（Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale，CPSSS）和院前急性卒中严重程度量表（prehospital acute stroke severity scale，PASS）。

结果本研究共纳入174例患者，其中54例（31.0%）患者诊断为急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中。RACE（AUC 0.888，95%CI 0.849～0.928）和LAMS（AUC 0.859，95%CI 0.812～0.905）对急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测效能最高，其次是FAST-ED（AUC 0.820，95%CI 0.768～0.872）、CPSSS（AUC 0.810，95%CI 0.756～0.863）和PASS（AUC 0.786，95%CI 0.727～0.844），三者之间差异无统计学意义。

结论院前卒中筛查量表在预测院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中方面均显示出良好的预测能力，其中RACE和LAMS的预测效能最高。

文章导读： 院前卒中筛查量表对院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测结果显示出良好的预测效能，其中RACE和LAMS的预测效能最高。

关键词: 卒中; 院内卒中; 大血管闭塞; 卒中筛查量表; 预测

Abstract:

Objective To investigate and analyze the predictive value of five prehospital stroke screening scales for in-hospital acute large vessel occlusive ischemic stroke.

Methods All patients admitted to Dongtai People’s Hospital for non-stroke-related diseases who activated the in-hospital stroke green channel due to suspected stroke symptoms during hospitalization from January 2015 to December 2022 were retrospectively included. The ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive value of the screening scales for in-hospital acute large vessel occlusive ischemic stroke. The five scales included field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination (FAST-ED), rapid arterial occlusion evaluation (RACE), Los Angeles motor scale (LAMS), Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale (CPSSS), and prehospital acute stroke severity scale (PASS).

Results A total of 174 patients were included in this study, of which 54 (31.0%) patients were diagnosed with acute large vessel occlusive ischemic stroke. RACE (AUC 0.888, 95%CI 0.849-0.928) and LAMS (AUC 0.859, 95%CI 0.812-0.905) had the highest predictive efficacy for acute large vessel occlusive ischemic stroke, followed by FAST-ED (AUC 0.820, 95%CI 0.768-0.872), CPSSS (AUC 0.810, 95%CI 0.756-0.863) and PASS (AUC 0.786, 95%CI 0.727-0.844), and there was no significant difference among them.

Conclusions The prehospital stroke screening scales showed good predictive efficacy in predicting in-hospital acute large vessel occlusive ischemic stroke, and RACE and LAMS showed the highest predictive efficacy.

Key words: Stroke; In-hospital stroke; large vessel occlusion; Stroke screening scale; Prediction

中图分类号:

姜河, 王珵, 陈祥华, 许春香. 五种院前卒中筛查量表对院内急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的预测价值[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2024, 19(9): 1018-1024.

JIANG He, WANG Cheng, CHEN Xianghua, XU Chunxiang. Predictive Value of Five Prehospital Stroke Screening Scales for In-Hospital Acute Large Vessel Occlusive Ischemic Stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2024, 19(9): 1018-1024.

参考文献

[1] AKBIK F，XU H L，XIAN Y，et al. Trends in reperfusion therapy for in-hospital ischemic stroke in the endovascular therapy era[J]. JAMA Neurol，2020，77（12）：1486-1495.

[2] QIU K，ZU Q Q，ZHAO L B，et al. Outcomes between in-hospital stroke and community-onset stroke after thrombectomy：propensity-score matching analysis[J]. Interv Neuroradiol，2022，28（3）：296-301.

[3] 邱凯，施海彬，祖庆泉，等. 院内急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓治疗效果和预后因素分析[J]. 介入放射学杂志，2021，30（2）：118-122.

QIU K，SHI H B，ZU Q Q，et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for in-hospital acute ischemic stroke：analysis of therapeutic effect and factors affecting prognosis[J]. J Intervent Radiol，2021，30（2）：118-122.

[4] LIMA F O，SILVA G S，FURIE K L，et al. Field assessment stroke triage for emergency destination：a simple and accurate prehospital scale to detect large vessel occlusion strokes[J]. Stroke，2016，47（8）：1997-2002.

[5] PéREZ DE LA OSSA N，CARRERA D，GORCHS M，et al. Design and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to predict large arterial occlusion：the rapid arterial occlusion evaluation scale[J]. Stroke，2014，45（1）：87-91.

[6] NAZLIEL B，STARKMAN S，LIEBESKIND D S，et al. A brief prehospital stroke severity scale identifies ischemic stroke patients harboring persisting large arterial occlusions[J]. Stroke，2008，39（8）：2264-2267.

[7] KATZ B S，MCMULLAN J T，SUCHAREW H，et al. Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity：Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale[J]. Stroke，2015，46（6）：1508-1512.

[8] HASTRUP S，DAMGAARD D，JOHNSEN S P，et al. Prehospital acute stroke severity scale to predict large artery occlusion：design and comparison with other scales[J]. Stroke，2016，47（7）：1772-1776.

[9] 中华医学会神经病学分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志，2018，51（9）：666-682.

Chinese Society of Neurology，Chinese Stroke Society. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2018[J]. Chin J Neurol，2018，51（9）：666-682.

[10] POHL M，HESSZENBERGER D，KAPUS K，et al. Ischemic stroke mimics：a comprehensive review[J/OL]. J Clin Neurosci，2021，93：174-182[2023-05-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.025.

[11] 中华医学会神经病学分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组，中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组. 中国急性缺血性卒中早期血管内介入诊疗指南2022[J]. 中华神经科杂志，2022，55（6）：565-580.

Chinese Society of Neurology，Chinese Stroke Society，Neurovascular Intervention Group of Chinese Society of Neurology. Chinese guidelines for the endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke 2022[J]. Chin J Neurol，2022，55（6）：565-580.

[12] 中华医学会神经病学分会，中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组，中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中早期血管内介入诊疗指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志，2018，51（9）：683-691.

[13] 周立新，倪俊. 院内缺血性卒中的诊疗现状与挑战[J]. 中国卒中杂志，2022，17（2）：200-207.

ZHOU L X，NI J. Current status and challenges of in-hospital ischemic stroke care[J]. Chin J Stroke，2022，17（2）：200-207.

[14] ZHAO H，COOTE S，PESAVENTO L，et al. Large vessel occlusion scales increase delivery to endovascular centers without excessive harm from misclassifications[J]. Stroke，2017，48（3）：568-573.

[15] 彭洁，谭守文. 急性大血管闭塞性卒中的院前预测因素分析[J]. 中国基层医药，2022，29（1）：38-44.

PENG J，TAN S W. Prehospital predictors of large-vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Chin J Prim Med Pharm，2022，29（1）：38-44.

[16] NARWAL P，CHANG A D，GRORY B M，et al. The addition of atrial fibrillation to the Los Angeles motor scale may improve prediction of large vessel occlusion[J]. J Neuroimaging，2019，29（4）：463-466.

[17] 刘婷，廖娟，刘莉，等. 改良CPSSS量表对急性前循环大血管闭塞性脑梗死的预测价值分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志，2021，16（7）：687-693.

LIU T，LIAO J，LIU L，et al. Analysis on the predictive value of modified Cincinnati prehospital stroke severity scale for acute large vessel occlusion in anterior circulation[J]. Chin J Stroke，2021，16（7）：687-693.

[18] GREWAL P，LAHOTI S，AROOR S，et al. Effect of known atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation status on the prehospital identification of large vessel occlusion[J/OL]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis，2019，28（12）：104404[2023-05-10]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104404.