中国卒中杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (07): 580-.

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

急性基底动脉闭塞的治疗进展

犹登霞,陈阳美   

  1. 400010 重庆
    重庆医科大学附属第二医院
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-05 出版日期:2013-07-20 发布日期:2013-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈阳美 chenym1977@sina.com

Progress in Treatment of Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion

  1. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2013-02-05 Online:2013-07-20 Published:2013-07-20

摘要:

【摘要】 基底动脉闭塞病情重,致死率和致残率高,静脉溶栓、动脉溶栓治疗和机械取栓治疗是目前最常见的治疗方法。与静脉溶栓相比,动脉溶栓或机械取栓治疗血管再通率较高,且时间窗较静脉溶栓治疗宽,但目前的研究并未证实动脉溶栓或机械取栓治疗优于静脉溶栓治疗。桥接治疗是结合静脉溶栓与动脉溶栓或机械取栓的具有发展前景的一种治疗新模式,但其有效性还需要进一步证实。本文将对急性基底动脉闭塞相关的治疗方法:静脉溶栓、动脉溶栓、机械取栓治疗等做一综述,以促进对急性基底动脉闭塞血管再通治疗的认识。

文章导读: 本文对急性基底动脉闭塞的血管再通的治疗方法进行介绍,以促进对基底动脉闭塞患者静脉溶栓、动脉溶栓、机械取栓治疗与桥接治疗新模式的认识。

关键词: 基底动脉闭塞; 溶栓; 机械取栓; 桥接治疗

Abstract:

【Abstract】 Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating neurological condition with a high rate of fatality and disability. Compared with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), the recanalization of intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) or mechanical thrombectomy is higher and the thrombolysis treatment time is longer, but it is not confirmed in reported researches that IAT or mechanical thrombectomy is better than IVT. The bridging therapy which combines IVT with IAT or mechanical thrombectomy therapy is a new treatment mode, but its effectiveness needs to be confirmed. We reviewed the different thrombolysis therapies to further understand the treatment progress of BAO which include IVT, IAT, mechanical thrombectomy and so on.

Key words: Basilar occlusion; Thrombolysis; Mechanical thrombectomy; Bridging therapy