中国卒中杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (12): 1104-1110.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2017.12.007

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

初次培训后ASPECT评分一致性和准确性的研究

邓国莉,周龙江,赵义,陈斌,王礼同,彭伟,王苇   

  1. 1225009 扬州大学附属医院影像科
    2仪征市人民医院影像科
    3扬州大学附属医院神经科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-18 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2017-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 王苇 waywang@126.com

Study on Consistency and Accuracy of ASPECTS after the Initial Training

  • Received:2017-01-18 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2017-12-20

摘要:

目的 评价初次培训后Alberta卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描(computed tomography,CT)评分(Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score,ASPECTS)的一致性和准确性,为其临床应用及推广奠定基础。 方法 收集30例起病6 h内脑梗死患者CT及简要临床资料。对不同科室28人(其中影像科21人,神经 内科7人)、不同资历(工龄≥10年18人、<10年10人)进行初次培训后,对所有患者入院首次非增强 CT(noncontrast CT,NCCT)进行ASPECTS。将ASPECTS作为分类变量,采用Fleiss' Kappa值评估ASPECTS 系统的一致性,采用正确率评估ASPECTS系统的准确性。 结果 整体ASPECTS的Kappa值为0.102,95%可信区间(confidence interval,CI)为(0.094,0.110);影 像科、神经内科评分者的Kappa值及95%CI分别为0.116(0.105,0.128)、0.067(0.034,0.099)。正确 率:28位评分者整体840例次ASPECTS具体分值的正确率为15.595%;二分法(ASPECTS≥6或<6)为 73.571%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同科室的二分法正确率:影像科74.92%,神经内科 69.523%,差异无统计学意义。二分法不同资历正确率:工龄≥10年74.814%,工龄<10年61.665%,差 异无统计学意义。 结论 初次培训后ASPECTS的一致性与准确性均较低,提示多次、严格ASPECTS培训极为必须和重 要;二分法(ASPECTS≥6或ASPECTS<6)有较好的临床应用前景。

文章导读: 本研究以磁共振弥散加权成像为主要依据确定Alberta卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分(Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score,ASPECTS)标准结果,以此评价真实世界ASPECTS的准确性和一致性,揭示其中存在的问题,为其临床应用和推广提出改良思考。

关键词: 缺血性卒中; Alberta卒中项目早期CT评分; 正确率; 一致性

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the consistency and accuracy of Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) after the initial training, so as to lay a foundation for the clinical applications and propagations. Methods Brief clinical materials of 30 patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke were collected within 6 hours after onset. A total of 28 employees (21 from imaging department and 7 from neurology department) with different professional working-year (18 people with 10 years or more as senior employees, and the other 10 with less than 10 years as junior employees) were selected to make ASPECTS for all the patients’ first admission noncontrast CT (NCCT) after their initial training. The ASPECTS was taken as a categorical variable. Its consistency was evaluated by Fleiss Kappa statistics, and its accuracy was assessed by the correct rate. Results The overall ASPECTS Kappa value was 0.102, and 95% confidence interval was (0.094, 0.110); the raters Kappa value and 95% confidence interval from imaging department was 0.116 (0.105, 0.128); the raters Kappa value and 95% confidence interval from neurology department was 0.067 (0.034, 0.099). Accuracy: the correct rate of 28 raters was 15.595% after 840 case-time ASPECTS in overall. With the method of dichotomy (ASPECTS ≥6 and <6) the correct rate was  73.571%. Statistics result of chi-square test for the two methods had significant difference (P <0.05). The dichotomy correct rate of imaging department and neurology department were 74.92% and 69.523% respectively, which had no significant difference. The correct rate of senior employees and junior ones were 74.814% and 61.665% respectively, which had no significant difference. Conclusion The consistency and the accuracy of ASPECTS were relatively low after the initial training, which indicated that more times and strict trainings were very essential and important and Dichotomy (ASPECTS ≥6 or ASPECTS <6) had a relatively good clinical application prospection.

Key words: Ischemic stroke; Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score; Accuracy; Consistency