Chinese Journal of Stroke ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02): 157-162.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.02.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Clopidogrel plus Aspirin Therapy on Functional Outcome in Minor Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack:Pooled Analysis of CHANCE and POINT

  

  • Received:2020-12-04 Online:2021-02-20 Published:2021-02-20

氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林治疗对轻型卒中与短暂性脑缺血发作患者功能预后的影响:CHANCE与POINT试验联合分析

潘岳松,J. Donald Easton,李昊,Anthony S. Kim,孟霞,S. Claiborne Johnston,金奥铭,王拥军   

  1. 1北京 100070首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经病学中心;国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心
    2加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校神经内科
    3得克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校戴尔医学院
  • 通讯作者: 王拥军 yongjunwang@ncrcnd.org.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点研发计划(2018YFC1312903)
    国家科技重大专项(2017ZX09304018)
    北京市科技计划项目(D171100003017002;Z181100001818001)

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy on functional outcome in patients with minor stroke or TIA. Methods Individual patient-level data from the CHANCE and POINT trial were extracted and pooled. In the 2 trials, the patients were randomly given clopidogrel plus aspirin or aspirin alone within 12 hours (POINT) or 24 hours (CHANCE) from symptom onset. The main outcome were poor functional outcome (mRS≥2), and 3-level ordinal stroke scale [classified as disabling or fatal recurrent stroke (mRS≥2), nondisabling recurrent stroke (mRS 0 or 1) and no recurrent stroke]. Results This analysis included individual data from 10 013 patients, of which 5132 patients (51.3%) were derived from the CHANCE trial and 4881 (48.7%) were derived from the POINT trial, with 4995 (49.9%) cases were in clopidogrel plus aspirin group and 5018 (50.1%) were in aspirin alone group. The proportion of patients with poor functional outcome at 3 months in clopidogrel plus aspirin group was lower than that in aspirin alone group (11.6% vs 12.6%, adjusted OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.72- 0.94, P =0.005). Compared with the aspirin alone group, the dual antiplatelet therapy group also had lower risk of disabling or fatal recurrent stroke (4.6% vs 6.1%, adjusted OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.61- 0.87, P <0.001), nondisabling recurrent stroke (1.9% vs 3.0%, adjusted OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.47-0.80, P <0.001) and the overall disability for recurrent stroke (adjusted common OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.60-0.81, P <0.001). Conclusions Compared to aspirin alone, clopidogrel plus aspirin dual antiplatelet therapy can further improved functional outcome and reduced disabling recurrent stroke at 3 months in patients with minor ischemic stroke or TIA. 

Key words: Clopidogrel; Minor stroke; Transient ischemic attack; Functional outcome;Disability

摘要:

目的 评价氯吡格雷联合阿司匹林双抗治疗对轻型缺血性卒中与TIA患者功能预后的影响。 方法 提取CHANCE和POINT试验所有的个体数据。这两项试验中,所有纳入患者在症状发作12 h (POINT)或24 h(CHANCE)以内随机接受氯吡格雷联用阿司匹林或单用阿司匹林治疗。结局指标为3个 月时功能预后不良(mRS≥2),三等级定义卒中复发[致残性或致死性卒中复发(mRS≥2)、非致残性 卒中复发(mRS 0或1)、无卒中复发]。 结果 共10 013例患者纳入分析,其中来自CHANCE试验5132例(51.3%),来自POINT试验4881例 (48.7%);氯吡格雷联用阿司匹林组4995例(49.9%),单用阿司匹林组5018例(50.1%)。氯吡格雷联 用阿司匹林组3个月时功能预后不良的患者比例低于单用阿司匹林组(11.6% vs 12.6%,校正OR 0.82, 95%CI 0.72~0.94,P =0.005)。氯吡格雷联用阿司匹林组致残性或致死性卒中复发(4.6% vs 6.1%, 校正OR 0.73,95%CI 0.61~0.87,P <0.001)、非致残性卒中复发(1.9% vs 3.0%,校正OR 0.62,95%CI 0.47~0.80,P <0.001)和卒中复发的整体致残性(校正cOR 0.70,95%CI 0.60~0.81,P <0.001)低于单 用阿司匹林组。 结论 与单用阿司匹林治疗相比,氯吡格雷联用阿司匹林治疗可进一步改善轻型缺血性卒中和TIA 患者3个月时功能预后,减少致残性卒中复发。

关键词: 氯吡格雷; 轻型卒中; 短暂性脑缺血发作; 功能预后; 残疾