Chinese Journal of Stroke ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (07): 758-769.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2023.07.004

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Common Misconception in Clinical Prediction Model Research

WANG Haoyue, WANG Junfeng   

  • Received:2023-05-24 Online:2023-07-20 Published:2023-07-20

临床预测模型研究中的常见误区

王昊玥,王俊峰   

  1. 1  阿姆斯特丹 1081 HZ阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心流行病与数据科学系
    2  乌特勒支 3584 CG乌特勒支大学药物流行病与临床药理学系

  • 通讯作者: 王俊峰 wangjunfeng7@gmail.com

Abstract: Taking the inappropriate practices in existing research pointed out by a leading expert in clinical prediction models as examples, this paper introduced common misunderstandings in clinical prediction model research, explained why specific practices will jeopardize the model quality, and how to avoid repeating the same mistakes in future studies. The feasibility of using ChatGPT to provide methodological guidance is discussed by evaluating the answers given by ChatGPT.

Key words: Clinical prediction model; Methodological quality; Risk of bias

摘要: 本文结合临床预测模型领域专家指出的现有研究中的不恰当做法,介绍了临床预测模型研究中的常见误区,解析了为什么特定的做法会对模型质量产生不良影响,以及如何避免重蹈覆辙。同时,通过评价ChatGPT给出的答案,探讨ChatGPT用于提供方法学指导的可行性。

关键词: 临床预测模型; 方法学质量; 偏倚风险