ISSN 1673-5765 CN 11-5434/R
Peer Review and Editing
1 Review Policy：The journal follows a double-blind review process. After submission, the editorial office will conduct a preliminary review of the manuscript. The editorial office will reject the manuscripts which are insufficient in originality, have serious scientific or technical mistakes, lack valuable information, or are not within the scope of the journal. The manuscripts which have passed the preliminary review will be anonymously sent to two or more reviewers, who evaluate the article on scientificity, innovation and practicality. The authors must respond to the reviewers' every comment and submit the revised version in time. This process would be repeated until reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript. The editorial office shall impartially select manuscripts on the basis of academic quality and the review comment. For the final round of review, the Deputy Editor-in-Chief decides whether the article can be published or not.
2 Editing Policy：All authors shall be responsible for their own writing. According to the Copyright Law, for the accepted manuscripts, the journal may make some technical or wording amendments. However, if the amendment involves a change of meaning, the editorial office will contact the authors for confirmation.
3 Timing：After receiving the manuscript, the editorial office will generally notify the author of acceptance within 3 months. If the review result has not been received more than 3 months after submission, it can be inquired to editorial office. Manuscripts to be accepted need to be revised for several times, the longest revision time limit is 1 month after notifying the author of each review opinion. Over the deadline, the manuscript will be regarded as being withdrawn.
4 Submission by Editors：The editorial staff/editors/editorial board members should not be involved in publishing decisions on papers which they have written themselves or have been written by their family members or colleagues. Any such submission should be strictly subject to the journal’s usual editorial process. Peer review should be handled independently from the relevant author/editor and their research groups.