Effect of Rehabilitation at Different Timing after Stroke on Motor Function of Stroke Patients
SUN Moyi, ZHANG Yumei, LIU Ran, ZHAO Yishuang
2022, 17(11):
1209-1215.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2022.11.009
Asbtract
(
)
PDF (2143KB)
(
)
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To investigate the effects of rehabilitation at different timing after stroke on motor function of stroke patients.
Methods Patients with stroke who met the inclusion criteria from Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Department of Neurology of Beijing Zhongguancun Hospital from January 2021 to February 2022 were prospectively enrolled in this study, and the patients were divided into early rehabilitation group and delayed rehabilitation group according to the time of rehabilitation intervention. Patients in early rehabilitation group started rehabilitation within 7 days of onset after stable condition, while patients in delayed rehabilitation group started rehabilitation more than 30 days after onset after stable condition. All the patients were assessed by the same assessor before the rehabilitation, at 1 month ± 7 days and 3 months ± 7 days of rehabilitation using NIHSS, Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA), Berg balance scale (BBS), 6-minute walking test (6MWT), functional gait assessment (FGA), and modified Barthel index (MBI) to assess the neurological fuction, motor function, balance, walking ability and activities of daily living.
Results A total of 70 patients were included, with 35 cases in each group. Before rehabilitation, there were no statistical differences in the above scores between the two groups. At 1 month ± 7 days and 3 months ± 7 days of rehabilitation, NIHSS decreased and FMA, BBS, 6MWT, FGA and MBI scores increased in both groups compared with those before rehabilitation, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). At 1 month ± 7 days of rehabilitation, the NIHSS in early rehabilitation group was lower than that in delayed rehabilitation group [1.0 (0-2.0) vs. 2.0 (0-6.0), P=0.030], and the 6MWT score was higher than that in delayed rehabilitation group [200.0 (80.0-300.0) m vs. 150.0 (0-230.0) m, P=0.040], while there were no statistical differences in FMA, BBS, FGA and MBI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months ± 7 days of rehabilitation, the NIHSS was lower in early rehabilitation group than that in delayed rehabilitation group [0 (0-0) vs. 1.0 (0-4.0), P=0.001], BBS score [54.0 (49.0-56.0) vs. 49.0 (33.0-54.0), P=0.013], 6MWT [320.0 (200.0-430.0) m vs. 210.0 (80.0-360.0) m, P=0.009], FGA score [22.0 (15.0-28.0) vs. 15.0 (5.0-24.0), P=0.015], MBI score [100.0 (95.0-100.0) vs. 90.0 (70.0-100.0), P=0.003] were all higher than those in delayed rehabilitation group, and there was no statistical difference in FMA score between the two groups (P=0.053).
Conclusions Rehabilitation training can improve the motor function of stroke patients, and the early rehabilitation intervention can improve the neurological function, balance, walking ability and activities of daily living of stroke patients better than delayed rehabilitation.