Chinese Journal of Stroke ›› 2022, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06): 648-652.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2022.06.017
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
通讯作者:
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the reasons for loss of follow-up after discharge among acute ischemic stroke patients during the outbreak of novel coronavirus pneumonia.
Methods The high-risk patients with acute ischemic stroke who were hospitalized in Department of Neurology, the Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University from January 2020 to December 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. According to the electronic medical records, the patients without recheck at the clinic for 3 months after discharge were included in the lost to follow-up group, and the other patients were included in the no lost to follow-up group. The clinical information of electronic medical records were collected. A questionnaire was conducted on the patients by on-site visit, calling and survey. The clinical information and questionnaires results between the two groups were compared to analyze the factors of loss of follow-up. In addition, the open questioning method was used to investigate the reasons for the loss of follow-up.
Results There were 495 discharged patients, of whom 167 patients were lost to follow-up, and 328 were followed up. The proportion of stroke recurrence (31.1% vs. 21.0%, P=0.013), hypertension (54.5% vs. 43.0%, P=0.015) and previous stroke (52.1% vs. 39.3%, P=0.007), and NIHSS score at discharge (3.67±1.76 points vs. 3.25±1.12 points, P<0.001) in the lost to follow-up group were higher than those in no lost to follow-up group, and the percentage of taking secondary prevention drugs after discharge (69.5% vs. 86.3%, P<0.001) was lower than that in no lost to follow-up group. The main reasons for the loss of follow-up were "epidemic reasons, felling unsafe for going to the hospital" (18.0%), "using traditional Chinese medicine treatment" (13.8%), "buy medicine at the drugstore" (13.2%), "having recovered" (8.4%), "lack of caregivers" (7.2%), and "a follow-up visit at the local hospital" (6.6%).
Conclusions The patients with acute ischemic stroke who were lost to follow-up after discharge had a higher proportion of hypertension and previous stroke, severe neurological deficit at discharge, a lower proportion of taking secondary prevention drugs after discharge, and a higher risk of stroke recurrence. The COVID-19 was the most common reason for the loss of follow-up during the epidemics.
Key words: Acute ischemic stroke; Outpatient department; Follow up; Lost to follow-up;Novel coronavirus pneumonia
摘要:
目的 分析新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间急性缺血性卒中患者出院后门诊随诊失访情况及失访原因。
方法 连续入组2020年1-12月在潍坊医学院附属医院神经内科住院的高危急性缺血性卒中患者,根据电子病历系统记录,筛选出出院后连续3个月未前往门诊复诊的患者为失访组。根据病历提取患者住院期间信息,包括人口学资料、血管危险因素、TOAST分型、症状等。采用现场、电话询问、调查访问相结合的方法对患者进行问卷调查,包括患者的职业、学历、婚姻、医保等信息。比较失访组与未失访组上述指标的差异。进一步采用开放式提问方法调查失访组的主要失访原因。
结果 研究期间出院的495例患者中,未失访患者共328例,失访患者167例。失访组卒中复发率高于未失访组(31.1% vs. 21.0%,P =0.013),高血压(54.5% vs. 43.0%,P =0.015)、既往卒中(52.1% vs.39.3%,P =0.007)比例和出院时NIHSS(3.67±1.76分 vs. 3.25±1.12分,P<0.001)均高于未失访组,院外服用二级预防药物比例(69.5% vs . 86.3%,P<0.001)低于未失访组,差异有统计学意义。失访组的失访原因主要为“疫情原因,担心去医院不安全”(18.0%),“现在采用中药治疗”(13.8%),“能在药店买到药”(13.2%),“已经痊愈”(8.4%),“儿女不在身边,去不了”(7.2%),“已在当地医院随诊”(6.6%)。
结论 急性缺血性卒中患者出院后失访组高血压、既往卒中比例较高,出院时神经功能缺损较重,院外二级预防药物使用比例较低,且卒中复发率高。受新冠肺炎疫情影响是疫情期间患者出院后门诊随诊失访最主要的原因。
关键词: 急性缺血性卒中; 门诊; 随诊; 失访; 新型冠状病毒肺炎
XUAN Guiying, FAN Caili, XUAN Lixia, ZHAO Qianqian, LI Xuemei. Analysis of Reasons for Loss of Follow-up among Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2022, 17(06): 648-652.
玄桂英, 范彩丽, 玄丽霞, 赵倩倩, 李雪梅. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间急性缺血性卒中患者门诊随诊失访原因分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(06): 648-652.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2022.06.017
https://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/Y2022/V17/I06/648
[1] 《中国卒中报告2019》编写委员会. 中国卒中报告2020(中文版)(1)[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2022,17(5):433-447.
[2] 彭斌. 联合抗血小板药物在缺血性脑卒中二级预防中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版),2020,14(1):21-24[2021-07-09]. https://zhnxgbzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/CN/10.11817/j.issn.1673-9248.2020. 01.003.
[3] FEIGIN V L,NORRVING B,GEORGE M G,et al. Prevention of stroke:a strategic global imperative[J]. Nat Rev Neurol,2016,12(9):501-512.
[4] 张永丽,牟亚婷,王静梅. 脑卒中患者随访现状的相关研究[J]. 甘肃医药,2021,40(3):202-204.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J]. 中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682.
[6] 高丽燕,郭婵媛,王晓蕾. 新冠肺炎疫情期间浙江省居民焦虑抑郁现状及影响因素[J]. 上海护理,2020,20(9):28-31.
[7] 张金龙,孙蓉,杨娟. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情流行期间老年患者的焦虑抑郁状态及其影响因素[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2020,19(4):246-250.
[8] 赵明霞,葛海霞,张拥波,等. 新冠肺炎疫情对神经内科门诊患者就诊情况的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2020,19(4):691-693.
[9] 王倩,支晓,武鹏,等. 医院-社区协同健康管理模式在脑卒中高危人群中的干预效果研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2017,20(26):3205-3209,3220.
[10] 刘芹,杜艳红,施燕红,等. 社区脑卒中筛查有效性的分析[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版),2013,7(1):390-392[2021-07-09].http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_zhnxbbzz201301006&dbid=WF_QK.