Effects of Home Occupational Therapy Based on Person-Environment-Occupation Model on Functional Prognosis of Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2023.04.009

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To investiage the effects of home occupational therapy based on person-environment-occupation (PEO) model on upper limb function, activity of daily living and quality of life in stroke patients with hemiplegia.
Methods This study prospectively enrolled the patients with hemiplegia after stroke from Department of Rehabilitation Medicine of Nanjing Pukou People's Hospital (Formerly Nanjing Pukou Central Hospital) from January 2020 to December 2020. The patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group. The Wechat group was established in both groups. The rehabilitation video updated regularly in the control group, and the personalized PEO-based video updates for each patient were performed in observation group. The Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity scale (FMA-UE) for upper limb motor function, Barthel index (BI) and stroke-specific quality of life (SS-QOL) were assessed in both groups at discharge, and at 3, 6 and 12 months after discharge.
Results A total of 60 patients were eventually included, with a mean age of 63.10±6.83 years old and 30 males, and 30 patients in each group. ①Comparison within a group: for observation group, the BI score (57.00±7.83 vs. 53.17±8.36, P<0.001) and FMA-UE score
(47.23±6.66 vs. 45.47±6.63, P<0.001) at 3 months after discharge were higher than those at discharge; the BI score (57.33±7.58 vs. 53.17±8.36, P<0.001) and FMA-UE score (47.23±6.66 vs. 45.47±6.63, P<0.001) at 6 months after discharge were higher than those at discharge; the FMA-UE score (46.57±6.39 vs. 45.47±6.63, P<0.001) at 12 months after discharge was higher than that at discharge. For control group, the BI score (51.00±6.87 vs. 54.00±7.59 ,
P<0.001) and FMA-UE score (43.67±6.99 vs. 45.60±6.96, P<0.001) at 6 months after discharge were lower than those at discharge; the BI score (48.50±6.45 vs. 54.00±7.59, P<0.001), FMA-UE score (41.97±6.61 vs. 45.60±6.96, P<0.001) and SS-QOL scores (152.77±8.11 vs. 158.43±10.07, P<0.001) at 12 months after discharge were lower than those at discharge. ②Comparison between two groups:the BI score (57.33±7.58 vs. 51.00±6.87, P=0.010) and FMA-UE score (47.23±6.66 vs. 43.67±6.99, P=0.048) at 6 months after discharge, and the BI score (55.67±6.92 vs. 48.50±6.45, P<0.001) , FMA-UE score (46.57±6.39 vs. 41.97±6.61, P=0.008) and SS-QOL scores (159.10±10.66 vs. 152.77±8.11, P=0.012) at 12 months after discharge in observation group were higher than those in the control group.
Conclusion The PEO-based home occupational therapy can obviously improve upper limb function, activity of daily living and quality of life in stroke patients with hemiplegia.

Key words: Person-environment-occupation model; Home occupational therapy; Stroke; Quality of life

摘要： 目的研究基于人-环境-作业（person-environment-occupation，PEO）模式的家庭作业治疗对卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能、日常生活活动能力及生活质量的影响。
方法前瞻性、连续纳入2020年1月—2020年12月南京市浦口人民医院（原南京市浦口区中心医院）康复医学科出院的卒中偏瘫患者，随机分为试验组和对照组，并分别建立微信群聊，对照组定期更新康复小视频，有任何问题随时咨询。试验组基于PEO模式，个性化更新每位患者的小视频，两组分别于出院时、出院3个月、6个月和12个月分别进行Fugl-Meyer运动功能量表上肢部分（Fugl-Meyer assessment upper extremity scale，FMA-UE）、日常生活活动能力Barthel指数（Barthel index，BI）及卒中专用生活质量量表（stroke-specific quality of life scale，SS-QOL）的评定。
结果最终纳入卒中偏瘫患者60例，平均年龄（63.10±6.83）岁，其中男性30例。将入组患者随机分为对照组和试验组各30例。组内比较显示，试验组出院3个月BI评分[（57.00±7.83）分 vs.（53.17±8.36）分，P<0.001]、FMA-UE评分[（46.57±6.67）分 vs.（45.47±6.63）分，P<0.001]、SS-QOL评分[（162.77±11.98）分 vs.（157.90±13.2）分，P<0.001]均高于出院时。试验组出院6个月BI评分[（57.33±7.58）分 vs.（53.17±8.36）分，P<0.001]、FMA-UE评分[（47.23±6.66）分 vs.（45.47±6.63）分，P<0.001]均高于出院时；出院12个月FMA-UE评分[（46.57±6.39）分 vs.（45.47±6.63）分，P<0.001]高于出院时。对照组出院6个月BI评分[（51.00±6.87）分 vs.（54.00±7.59）分，P<0.001]、FMA-UE评分[（43.67±6.99）分 vs.（45.60±6.96）分，P<0.001]均较出院时下降；出院12个月BI评分[（48.50±6.45）分 vs.（54.00±7.59）分，P<0.001]、FMA-UE评分[（41.97±6.61）分 vs.（45.60±6.96）分，P<0.001]和SS-QOL评分[（152.77±8.11）分 vs.（158.43±10.07）分，P<0.001]均较出院时下降。组间比较显示，试验组出院6个月的BI评分[（57.33±7.58）分 vs.（51.00±6.87）分，P=0.010]、FMA-UE评分[（47.23±6.66）分 vs.（43.67±6.99）分，P=0.048]，出院12个月BI评分[（55.67±6.92）分 vs.（48.50±6.45）分，P<0.001]、FMA-UE评分[（46.57±6.39）分 vs.（41.97±6.61）分，P=0.008]和SS-QOL评分[（159.10±10.66）分 vs.（152.77±8.11）分，P=0.012]均高于对照组。
结论基于PEO模式的家庭作业治疗对卒中偏瘫患者上肢功能、日常生活活动能力及生活质量的效果维持显著有效。

关键词: 人-环境-作业模式; 家庭作业治疗; 卒中; 生存质量

BAI Min, YANG Ting, ZHOU Yan, MA Teng, LI Xueping.

Effects of Home Occupational Therapy Based on Person-Environment-Occupation Model on Functional Prognosis of Stroke Patients with Hemiplegia

[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2023, 18(04): 434-439.

柏敏, 杨婷, 周岩, 马腾, 李雪萍. 基于PEO模式的家庭作业治疗对卒中偏瘫患者功能预后的影响[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2023, 18(04): 434-439.

References

[1] 肖爽，朱以诚. 脑卒中的性别差异：流行病学、危险因素、治疗及预后[J]. 中国神经免疫学和神经病学杂志，2020，27（1）：57-60.
[2] 王陇德，刘建民，杨弋，等. 我国脑卒中防治仍面临巨大挑战——《中国脑卒中防治报告2018》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志，2019，34：105-119.
[3] WANG W，JIANG B，SUN H，et al. Prevalence，incidence，and mortality of stroke in China：results from a nationwide population-based survey of 480687 adults[J]. Circulation，2017，135（8）：759-771.
[4] 马晓超，毕春红，冯善军. 我国脑卒中功能障碍患者家庭康复的现状与展望[J]. 中国康复理论与实践，2014，20（10）：932-934.
[5] 魏苗，胥方元. 脑卒中偏瘫患者的作业治疗指导[J]. 中国老年学杂志，2012，10（32）：4356-4358.
[6] 林玲陈琪琪苏丽丽等. 基于PEO模式的作业治疗对脑卒中照顾者的影响[J]. 浙江临床医学，2020，22（8）：1113-1115.
[7] 脑血管疾病分类（1995年）［J］. 中华神经外科杂志，1997，13（1）：5-6.
[8] SULLIVAN K J，TILSON J K，CEN S Y，et al. Fugl-meyer assessment of sen sorimotor function after stroke：standardized training procedure for clinical practice and clinical trials[J]. Stroke，2011，42（2）：427-432.
[9] SHAH S，VANCLAY F，COOPER B. Improving the sensitivity of the barthel index for stroke rehabilitation[J].J Clin EPidemiol，1989，42（8）：703-709.
[10] LIN K C，FU T，WU C Y，et al. Psychometric comparisons of the stroke impact scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale[J]. Qual Life Res，2010，19（3）：435-443.
[11] 饶蓉，叶頔，胡军. 脑卒中康复期患者院外接受延续性护理服务的研究[J]. 中国康复，2014，29（06）：453-454.
[12] MADDAHI A，BANI HANI J，ASGARI A，et al. The rapists' perspectives on a new portable hand telerehabilitation platform for home-based personalized treatment of stroke patients[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci，2021 ，25（18）：5790-5800.
[13] 高怡，鲍勇，谢青，等. 脑卒中患者基础性日常生活活动训练中PEO模式的应用研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志，2016，31（2）：208-211.
[14] 张洁，王勇勇，陈龙伟，等. PEO模式在手外伤功能障碍患者作业治疗中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践，2020，5（32）：23-25.
[15] 周欢霞，于小明，刘倩雯，等. 人—环境—作业模式促进脑卒中后手和上肢功能的康复[J]. 神经病学与神经康学杂志，2016，12（4）：181-185.
[16] 祁奇，郁嫣嫣，屠霞芬，等. 社区及家庭康复指导对脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志，2009，24（11）：1021-1023.
[17] 吴鸿玲，张毅，王奥，等. 基于远程康复平台的任务导向性训练对脑卒中后出院患者运动功能和日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志，2022，44（1）：40-43.
[18] 张晶，王斌全，魏绍辉. 脑卒中失能老年患者辅助器具使用情况的调查分析[J]. 护理学杂志，2017，32（1）：85-88.
[19] TORNBOM K，DANIELSSON A. Experiences of treadmill walking non-immersive virtual reality after stroke or acquired brain injury-a qualitative study[J/OL]. PLoS One，2018，13（12）：e0209214[2022-08-28].https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209214.
[20] 王冉，张英，陈芳婷等，家庭远程康复对脑卒中恢复后期患者运动功能和日常生活活动能力的影响[J]. 武汉大学学报（医学版），2020，41（5）：815-818.
[21] VAN DEN BERG M，CROTTY M，LIU E，et al. Early supported discharge by caregiver mediated exercises and e-health support after stroke（CARE，STROKE）[J]. Stroke，2016，47（7）：1885-1892.
[22] EMMERSON K B，HANDING K E，LOCKWOOD K J，et al. Home exercise programs supported by video and automated reminders for patients with stroke a qualitative analysis[J]. Aust Occup Ther J，2018，65（3）：187-197.