Abstract: Objective  To construct an evaluation index system for academic leaders in cerebrovascular disease using a modified Delphi method, providing a reference for healthcare institutions in leader recruitment, performance assessment, and talent development. 
Methods  A preliminary evaluation index system for academic leaders was drafted based on existing literature. Using the modified Delphi method, 40 experts were selected from leading academic figures in cerebrovascular disease and related fields, outstanding academic leaders, and professionals engaged in medical human resource management and health service management research. Two rounds of expert consultation were conducted to form an evaluation index system for academic leaders in cerebrovascular disease. The analytical hierarchy process was used to determine the weightings of the first, second, and third-level indicators. 
Results  The effective response rates for the two rounds of expert consultation were 90% and 100%, respectively. Four first-level indicators were established: knowledge and skills, management ability, social recognition, and personal characteristics, with corresponding weightings of 0.430, 0.169, 0.350, and 0.051. The overall authority coefficient was 0.853, which is greater than 0.7. The final evaluation index system for academic leaders in cerebrovascular disease consists of 4 first-level indicators, 6 second-level indicators, and 23 third-level indicators. The Kendall’s concordance coefficients for the first, second, and third-level indicators were 0.482 (P<0.001), 0.372 (P<0.001), and 0.498 (P<0.001), respectively.
Conclusions  The evaluation index system for academic leaders in cerebrovascular disease constructed in this study includes 4 first-level indicators, 6 second-level indicators, and 23 third-level indicators. It has a certain scientific nature and can provide a reference for the assessment of leaders in the cerebrovascular disease field.

Key words: Cerebrovascular disease; Academic leader; Delphi method; Analytic hierarchy process; Evaluation index system

摘要： 目的 基于改良德尔菲法构建脑血管病学科带头人的评价指标体系，为医疗相关专业机构进行学科带头人的招聘甄选、绩效考核、人才培养等提供参考。
方法 参考既往文献初步拟定学科带头人的评价指标体系。采用改良德尔菲法分别从脑血管病和相关专业领域学科带头人、优秀学科骨干，以及从事医疗人力资源管理和卫生事业管理研究等专业的人员中遴选咨询专家40人，进行两轮专家咨询，形成脑血管病学科带头人评价指标体系，并采用层次分析法确定一、二、三级指标的权重。
结果 两轮专家咨询的有效回收率分别为90%和100%，形成了知识技能、管理能力、社会认可和个性特征4个一级指标，权重分别为0.430、0.169、0.350、0.051，整体权威系数为0.853>0.7。最终构建了由4个一级指标、6个二级指标、23个三级指标构成的脑血管病学科带头人评价指标体系，一、二、三级指标的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.482（P<0.001）、0.372（P<0.001）、0.498（P<0.001）。
结论 本研究构建的脑血管病学科带头人评价指标体系包括4个一级指标、6个二级指标、23个三级指标，具有一定的科学性，可为脑血管病学科带头人的评估提供参考。

关键词: 脑血管病; 学科带头人; 德尔菲法; 层次分析; 评价指标体系