标准化培训流程对护士评定格拉斯哥昏迷评分可靠性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2023.09.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价标准化培训流程对护士进行GCS评分可靠性的影响。
方法基于目前GCS评估方法，采用文字讲解、测验和临床实践培训一体化的标准化培训流程，进行针对护士的评分规范培训。前瞻性、连续纳入收治于首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经重症医学科的危重神经系统疾病患者。选取20名低年资（工作2年以内）护士，在进行标准化GCS评分培训前和培训后分别对100例神经重症患者进行GCS评分。采用组内相关系数比较接受标准化培训流程前后，护士对GCS评分评价的一致性。此外，以做培训的神经重症专科医师的GCS评分为金标准，评估培训前后护士评估量表的效度。
结果标准化培训流程使低年资护士间评估GCS评分的信度，即GCS总分评价的组内相关系数从0.862升至0.956，语言反应评价的组内相关系数从0.874升至0.953，运动反应评价的组内相关系数从0.689升至0.922，睁眼反应评价的组内相关系数从0.486升至0.665。以神经重症专科医师评定的GCS评分为金标准，低年资护士评定GCS总分的效标效度从0.856升至0.942。
结论标准化培训流程可提高低年资护士评估GCS的信度和效度。

文章导读： GCS评分是临床判断患者意识程度的重要指标，本研究采用标准评定GCS的方法培训低年资护士，发现培训能够明显提高低年资护士评定GCS评分的信度和效度，尤其是对量表中睁眼和运动反应的评估。

关键词: 格拉斯哥昏迷量表; 标准化培训; 一致性

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect of standardized training on the reliability of Glasgow coma score (GCS) evaluation by nurses.
Methods The current internationally recognized GCS scoring standardized training including text explanation, test and clinical practice training, were conducted for nurses. The consecutive patients with severe neurological diseases who were admitted to Neurointensive care unit, Department of neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University were prospectively included. Twenty nurses with low seniority (less than 2 years of service) were selected to conduct GCS scores for 100 patients with severe neurological conditions before and after standardized GCS scoring training. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to compare the consistency of GCS scores evaluation before and after the standardized training. In addition, the GCS scores evaluation by neurointensive care specialists who conducted training were used as the gold standard to evaluate the validity of the nurses’ scale assessment before and after the training.
Results The standardized training improved the reliability of the GCS evaluation among the low seniority nurses, the ICC of GCS total score increased from 0.862 to 0.956, that of verbal response assessment increased from 0.874 to 0.953, that of motor response assessment increased from 0.689 to 0.922, and that of eye movement assessment increased from 0.486 to 0.665. After the training, the validity of the nurses in assessing GCS increased from 0.85 6 to 0.942.
Conclusions Standardized training can improve the reliability and validity of the GCS scale among the low seniority nurses.

Key words: GCS; Standardized training; Consistency

王艳新, 袁媛, 徐明, 晁明珠, 聂曦明. 标准化培训流程对护士评定格拉斯哥昏迷评分可靠性的影响[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2023, 18(9): 1001-1005.

WANG Yanxin, YUAN Yuan, XU Ming, CHAO Mingzhu, NIE Ximing. The Effect of Standardized Training on the Reliability of Glasgow Coma Score Evaluation by Nurses[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2023, 18(9): 1001-1005.

参考文献

[1] TEASDALE G，JENNETT B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale[J]. Lancet，1974，2（7872）：81-84.
[2] 李法良，陈龙，李静宇. 美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分对急性脑梗死患者溶栓治疗后出血的预测价值[J]. 中华老年医学杂志，2022，41（2）：158-161.
LI F L，CHEN L，LI J Y. Predictive value of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and Glasgow coma scale scores for bleeding after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Chin J Geriatr，2022，41（2）：158-161.
[3] 范婷，沈玉，游桂英. 格拉斯哥预后评分在急性心肌梗死患者住院期间新发房颤中的预测价值研究[J]. 四川医学，2022，43（2）：188-191.
FAN T，SHEN Y，YOU G Y. Predictive values of Glasgow prognostic score in new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction during hospitalization[J]. Sichuan Medical Journal，2022.43（2）：188-191.
[4] 吴平，杜仁佳，俞筠，等. 格拉斯哥预后评分在鼻咽癌预后评估中的作用[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志，2021，30（12）：1233-1237.
WU P，DU R J，YU J，et al. The role of Glasgow prognostic score in prognostic evaluation of nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Chin J Radiat Oncol，2021，30（12）：1233-1237.
[5] SELIOUTSKI O，AUINGER P，SIDDIQI O K，et al. Association of the verbal component of the GCS with mortality in patients with encephalopathy who are not undergoing mechanical ventilation[J/OL]. Neurology，2022，98（5）：e533-e540[2022-11-09]. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000013127.
[6] MBONDE A A，DEMAERSCHALK B M，ZHANG N，et al. Prognostic utility of daily changes in Glasgow coma scale and the full outline of unresponsiveness score measurement in patients with metabolic encephalopathy，central nervous system infections and stroke in Uganda[J]. Neurocrit Care，2021，35（3）：835-844.
[7] REITH F C，SYNNOT A，BRANDE R，et al. Factors influencing the reliability of the Glasgow coma scale：a systematic review[J]. Neurosurgery，2017，80（6）：829-839.
[8] REITH F C，BRANDE R，SYNNOT A，et al.
The reliability of the Glasgow coma scale：a systematic review[J]. Intensive Care Med，2016，42（1）：3-15.
[9] OZCELIK E E，CELIK S. Comparison of the Turkish versions of the Glasgow coma scale and four score used by intensive care nurses for neurological evaluation[J]. J Clin Nurs，2022，31（9/10）：1397-1406.
[10] TEMIZ N C，KOSE G，TEHLI O，et al. A comparison between the effectiveness of full outline of unresponsiveness and Glasgow coma score at neurosurgical intensive care unit patients[J]. Turk Neurosurg，2018，28（2）：248-250.
[11] BLEDSOE B E，CASEY M J，FELDMAN J，et al. Glasgow coma scale scoring is often inaccurate[J]. Prehosp Disaster Med，2015，30（1）：46-53.
[12] BODIEN Y G，BARRA A，TEMKIN N R，et al. Diagnosing level of consciousness：the limits of the Glasgow coma scale total score[J]. J Neurotrauma，2021，38（23）：3295-3305.
[13] FELDMAN A，HART K W，LINDSELL C J，et al. Randomized controlled trial of a scoring aid to improve Glasgow coma scale scoring by emergency medical services providers[J]. Ann Emerg Med，2015，65（3）：325-329.
[14] BAJAJ J，RATHORE S，PARIHAR V，et al. Teaching Glasgow coma scale assessment by videos：a prospective interventional study among surgical residents[J]. J Neurosci Rural Pract，2020，11（3）：381-384.
[15] GREEN S M，HAUKOOS J S，SCHRIGER D L. How to measure the Glasgow coma scale[J]. Ann Emerg Med，2017，70（2）：158-160.
[16] MASERATI M，FETZICK A，PUCCIO A. The Glasgow coma scale（GCS）：deciphering the motor component of the GCS[J]. J Neurosci Nurs，2016，48（6）：311-314.
[17] LANE P L，BAEZ A A，BRABSON T，et al. Effectiveness of a Glasgow coma scale instructional video for EMS providers[J]. Prehosp Disaster Med，2002，17（3）：142-146.