中国卒中杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (9): 1085-1088.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2023.09.017

• 教学园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

以问题为导向的教学法联合翻转课堂教学法在卒中临床教育中的应用

郭珍妮,傅钰丽,杨弋,王赞
  

  1. 长春 130021 吉林大学第一医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-27 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 王赞 wangzan@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    2021年吉林大学本科教学改革研究项目(2021XZC092)
    吉林大学研究生教育教学改革项目(2023JGY012)
    吉林大学研究生精品课程建设项目(2023jlyjp29)

Application of Problem-based Learning Combined with Flipped Classroom Teaching Method in Stroke Clinical Education

GUO Zhenni, FU Yuli, YANG Yi, WANG Zan   

  • Received:2022-12-27 Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-20

摘要: 目的 探讨以问题为导向的教学法(problem-based learning,PBL)联合翻转课堂教学法在卒中临床教育中的应用价值。
方法 纳入于2022年9—11月在吉林大学第一医院卒中中心进行住院医师规范化培训的70名研究生,将其随机分为对照组和研究组,每组各35人。对照组采用传统教学方法,研究组采用PBL联合翻转课堂教学法,经过为期8个课时的培训,对两组分别进行理论和实践考核,比较考核结果,采用问卷调查的形式对受试者自我综合能力提升效果进行评价。
结果 研究组的实践考核分数[(41.66±1.57)分 vs.(36.29±2.02)分]、理论与实践考核总分数[(88.26±2.06)分 vs.(82.17±2.48)分]以及包括学习兴趣[(3.9±0.4)分 vs.(3.2±0.4)分]、自学能力[(3.7±0.4)分 vs.(3.1±0.9)分]、临床问诊能力[(3.7±0.6)分 vs.(3.2±0.4)分]、创新能力[(3.6±0.5)分 vs.(2.9±0.5)分]和人际交往及团队协作能力[(3.9±0.3)分 vs.(3.0±0.9)分]在内的评分均高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
结论 PBL联合翻转课堂教学法可提高卒中临床教育的教学效果。

关键词: 以问题为导向的教学法; 翻转课堂; 临床医学; 教育研究

Abstract: Objective   To explore the application value of problem-based learning (PBL) combined with flipped classroom teaching method in stroke clinical education. 
Methods   A total of 70 postgraduate students who participated in the standardized training of resident physicians in the Stroke Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University from September 2022 to November 2022 were included and randomly divided into the experimental group and the control group, 35 in each group. The experimental group adopted PBL combined with flipped classroom teaching method, while the control group adopted traditional teaching method. After 8 class hours of training, the two groups were evaluated respectively in theory and practice, and the assessment results were compared. The enrolled students were asked to evaluate their improvement of self-comprehensive ability by questionnaire and compared the evaluation results. 
Results   The experimental group’s practical assessment score (41.66±1.57 vs. 36.29±2.02), the total theoretical and practical assessment score (88.26±2.06 vs. 82.17±2.48) and the improvement of comprehensive abilities including learning interest [ (3.9±0.4) points vs. (3.2±0.4) points], self-learning ability (3.7±0.4 vs. 3.1±0.9), clinical consultation ability (3.7±0.6 vs. 3.2±0.4) , innovation ability (3.6±0.5 vs. 2.9±0.5), interpersonal communication and teamwork ability (3.9±0.3 vs. 3.0±0.9) were higher than the control group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).
Conclusions   PBL combined with flipped classroom teaching method can improve the teaching effect of stroke clinical education. 

Key words: Problem-based learning; Flipped classroom; Clinical medicine; Educational research