中国卒中杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (06): 483-487.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

低强度华法林在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中高风险患者卒中一级预防中的疗效和安全性观察

张铁梅1,吴硕琳1,徐秀英2   

  1. 1100050 北京
    首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院老年病科
    2首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-08 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-06-20
  • 通讯作者: 徐秀英 13641115934@163.com

Efficacy and Safety Observation of Low Intensity Warfarin and Aspirin in the Prevention of Stroke in the Elderly Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation

  1. Department of Geriatrics, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2014-11-08 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-06-20

摘要:

目的   探讨低强度华法林在老年非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中高风险患者卒中一级预防中的疗效及安全性。 方法  本研究连续入组首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院2010年1月~2014年1月,心内科、老年科住院部及抗凝门诊确诊的治疗时间>1年的非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中高风险患者80例,根据患者接受治疗情况分为低强度华法林治疗组和阿司匹林对照组各40例,其中华法林组控制凝血酶原时间国际标准化比值(international normalized ratio,INR)为1.6~2.5,比较两组患者缺血性卒中及全身大出血等不良反应的发生率。 结果  两组间在性别、年龄、伴随疾病等方面差异无显著性。低强度华法林治疗组心源性脑栓塞发生率为2.5%,阿司匹林治疗组为7.5%,两组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。低强度华法林治疗组无其他部位栓塞发生,而阿司匹林治疗组患者其他部位栓塞仅1例,两组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。两组均无心源性短暂性脑缺血发作发生。低强度华法林治疗组与阿司匹林治疗组均无严重脑出血、肾出血、其他器官出血等并发症发生。 结论  低强度华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中高风险患者卒中一级预防中疗效性与安全性方面可能与阿司匹林相当。

文章导读: 本文通过回顾性研究发现低强度华法林在非瓣膜性心房颤动高卒中风险患者卒中一级预防中的疗效与安全性方面可能与阿司匹林相当。

关键词: 华法林; 阿司匹林; 心房颤动; 低强度抗凝

Abstract:

Objective  To explore the efficacy and safety of low intensity warfarin in the elderly patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the prevention of cerebral embolism. Methods  We consecutively enrolled 80 patients who were diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with treatment duration>1 year, admitted to Department of Cardiology and Department of Geriatrics of Beijing Tiantan Hospital from January 2010 to January 2014. The patients were divided into low intensity warfarin treatment group (40 patients) and aspirin treatment control group (40 patients), and international normalized ratio of low intensity warfarin treatment group was controlled within the range of 1.6~2.5. The incidence of ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage    were compared between both groups. Results  There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex and complications. The incidence of cardioembolic stroke in low intensity warfarin treatment group was 2.5%, 7.5% in aspirin treatment control group, there was no significant difference (P>0.05). There were no other organ embolisms in low intensity warfarin treatment group, but only one in aspirin treatment control group, but with no significant difference (P>0.05). There were no severe cerebral hemorrhage, renal hemorrhage, and bleeding from the other organs in both groups. Conclusion  Low-intensity warfarin in the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation stroke in terms of efficacy and safety may be comparable to aspirin.

Key words: Warfarin; Aspirin; Atrial fibrillation; Low intensity anticoagulation