中国卒中杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (11): 899-904.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

磁共振灌注参数对静脉溶栓后出血转化的预测研究

陈伟莉1,张圣2,张顺开1,楼敏2   

  1. 1瑞安市人民医院神经内科
    2浙江大学医学院附属第二医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2014-08-11 出版日期:2014-11-20 发布日期:2014-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 楼敏 loumingxc@vip.sina.com

Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Parameter to Predict Hemorrhagic Transformation after
Intravenous Thrombolysis

  1. Department of Neurology, Ruian People's Hospital, Wenzhou 325200, China
  • Received:2014-08-11 Online:2014-11-20 Published:2014-11-20

摘要:

目的 明确磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)灌注参数脑血流达峰时间(Tmax)是否能 预测急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后脑实质出血(parenchymal hemorrhage,PH),并确定其最佳阈值。 方法 回顾性分析接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者,依据欧洲协作急性卒中研究 Ⅱ(European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study Ⅱ,ECASS Ⅱ)标准在溶栓后24 h复查的MRI或计算机断 层扫描(computed tomography,CT)影像上评估出血转化。受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC)分析Tmax预测PH型出血的最佳阈值以及该阈值下的最佳预测体积,并用 Logistic回归分析PH型出血的独立预测因素。 结果 纳入分析112例患者,其中11例(9.8%)发生PH型出血转化。Tmax>8 s为预测PH型出血的最佳 阈值(曲线下面积=0.706,P =0.025),低灌注(Tmax>8 s区)体积大于45 ml为PH型出血的独立预测因 素,优势比(odds ratio,OR)=13.95,P =0.014;PH型出血组与无PH型出血组之间Tmax>14 s体积、Tmax >14 s/Tmax>8 s的比值均无统计学差异(P =0.064;P =0.74)。 结论 磁共振灌注参数Tmax>8 s为预测急性缺血性卒中溶栓后PH型出血转化的最佳阈值;低灌注 体积,而非低灌注严重程度,与PH型出血转化相关。

文章导读: 本文探讨了Tmax对溶栓后出血转化的预测能力,有助于指导更安全的溶栓实践。

关键词: 急性; 缺血性卒中; 出血转化; 脑血流达峰时间

Abstract:

Objective To test whether Tmax of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could predict cerebral parechymal hemorrhage (PH) after intravenous thrombolysis and then investigate its optimal threshold. Methods Acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis were retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up imaging of MRI or computed tomography (CT) within 24 hours was assessed for hemorrhagic transformation according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS Ⅱ) system. The optimal threshold and the optimal volume of Tmax to predict PH were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). The association of Tmax with PH was examined using Logistic regression. Results One hundred and twelve patients were analyzed, of whom 11 (9.8%) deveolped PH after thrombolysis. Tmax>8 s was the optimal threshold to predict PH (area under curve [AUC]=0.706, P =0.025). The volume >45 ml of hypoperfusion region (Tmax>8 s) was independently predictive of PH (P =0.014, odds ratio [OR]=13.95). There were no significant differences of the Tmax>14 s volumes or the ratio of Tmax>14 s/Tmax>8 s between PH group and non-PH group (P =0.064; P =0.74). Conclusion The MR perfusion parameter of Tmax>8 s was the optimal threshold to predict PH. Hypoperfusion volume, rather than hypoperfusion intensity, was associated with PH.

Key words: Acute; Ischemic stroke; Hemorrhagic transformation; Tmax