中国卒中杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (08): 745-749.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2019.08.002

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

数据库匹配方法提高卒中队列死亡结局准确性的研究

吕微,姜勇,孟霞,黄馨莹,周脉耕   

  1. 1100050 北京中国疾病预防控制中心慢性非传染性疾病预防控制中心
    2首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院国家神经系统疾病临床医学研究中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-19 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 周脉耕 maigengzhou@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    北京市科技计划项目(D151100002015003)
    国家重点研发计划资助(2018YFC1311700,2018YFC1311706)

Improve the Accuracy of Patients Death Outcome in Stroke Cohort Study by Database Matching

  • Received:2018-12-19 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-20

摘要:

目的 探索大型多中心卒中队列研究数据与行政管理数据匹配的情况,为同类临床研究数据质量控 制提供新的思路与方法。 方法 本研究选取2015-2017年入组并完成90 d随访的12 112例缺血性卒中队列患者为研究对象, 将研究对象与2015-2017年全国疾病监测系统死因监测数据库中所有死亡个案进行匹配,比较卒中 队列中未匹配到死亡信息而死因监测数据库显示死亡的队列患者与死亡信息正确匹配的队列患者在 地区、医院分布及患者特征等方面的差异。 结果 两组患者在地区、医院分布及患者特征等方面的差异均无统计学意义,但从数据趋势来 看,入院时NIHSS评分≤3分患者未成功匹配到死亡信息的比率明显高于入院时NIHSS评分>3分患者 (11.36% vs 6.56%);单独居住患者未成功匹配到死亡信息的比率明显高于与家人同住患者(13.16% vs 7.65%)。 结论 通过数据分析提示入院时神经功能缺损程度轻的患者、独居的患者随访调查时获得准确死 亡结局信息更不易。数据库匹配研究方法在一定程度上可弥补大型多中心队列研究随访信息缺失的 现象,通过两种不同来源死亡结局信息的互补,可获得更为准确的卒中死亡结局信息。

文章导读: 本文探讨了大型多中心卒中队列研究数据与行政管理数据匹配的研究方法,并分析了匹配过程中的问题,提高了大型卒中队列研究数据的准确性,为同类大型临床研究提供新的方法学参考。

关键词: 数据库匹配; 卒中队列; 死亡

Abstract:

Objective To explore the data matching profile between stroke cohort in large multicenter study and the administrative data, and to provide new ideas and methods for data quality control in similar clinical studies. Methods The data of 12 112 inpatients with ischemic stroke who completed the 90-day followup from multicenter clinical trial from 2015 to 2017 were selected. The selected data were matched with all the deaths in the China National Disease Surveillance Points System from 2015 to 2017. The differences in regional and hospital distribution and patients characteristics were compared and analyzed between the group of unmatched patients with no death information in stroke cohort study while who had died as shown in China National Disease Surveillance Points System and the group of matched patients with the same death information in the two data. Results There were no statistically significant differences in regional and hospital distribution and patients characteristics between the two groups. However, according to the data trend, the unmatched rate of death information in the patients with NIHSS ≤3 on admission was higher than that in the patients with NIHSS >3 on admission (11.36% vs 6.56%), and the unmatched rate of death information in the patients living alone was higher than that in the patients living with family (13.16%vs 7.65%). Conclusions It is more difficult to obtain accurate death outcome information in patients with relatively mild neurologic impairment and patients living alone after discharge. The database matching method can make up for the lack of follow-up information in large multicenter cohort studies, which can provide accurate death outcome information of patients for stroke cohort studies.

Key words: Database matching; Stroke cohort study; Death