中国卒中杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (10): 839-843.

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

自发性颈部动脉夹层与缺血性卒中

刘娟,周华东,王延江,崔敏,李玲,许志强   

  1. 400042 重庆
    第三军医大学大坪医院野战外科研究所神经内科,全军神经内科专科中心
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-15 出版日期:2013-10-20 发布日期:2013-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 周华东 zhouhuad@163.com

Spontaneous Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke

  1. Department of Neurology and Center for Clinical Neuroscience of PLA, Daping Hospital,Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
  • Received:2013-02-15 Online:2013-10-20 Published:2013-10-20

摘要:

自发性颈部动脉夹层(spontaneous cervical artery dissection,SCAD)是青中年缺血性卒中的主要病因之一。SCAD是遗传、环境、感染等多因素疾病,其中,血管相关危险因素与SCAD的关系仍然存在争论。研究显示,SCAD引起的缺血性卒中以血栓栓塞机制为主,因此,抗凝、抗血小板治疗是SCAD的主要治疗方式,但目前尚缺乏随机对照试验对两种治疗方式的疗效进行对比。同时,多项单中心病例研究证实了血管内支架治疗SCAD的有效性和安全性。

文章导读: 本文对自发性颈部动脉夹层与血管危险因素、缺血性卒中发生的关系及治疗新进展进行了总结。

关键词: 颈部动脉夹层; 缺血性卒中; 血管危险因素; 治疗

Abstract:

Spontaneous cervical artery dissection (SCAD) is one of the major cause of ischemic stroke in young and middle-aged patients. It is a multifactorial disease involving inheritance, environment, infection in which it is still controversy about the relationship between SCAD and vascular risk factors. Available evidence strongly favors embolism as the most common cause for ischemic stroke. Anticoagulation and antiplatelet are the main treatment options, but randomized trials are lacking to compare both options. There are several single-center studies to evaluate the validity and safety of endovascular stent therapy for SCAD. Most of SCAD has favorable prognosis.

Key words: Cervical artery dissection; Stroke, Ischemic; Vascular risk factors; Therapy