›› 2011, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (08): 636-642.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

艾森量表和精简的艾森量表预测中国非心房颤动性缺血性卒中患者复发的准确性

付广荣1,员伟强1,陈培豪2,林嵩艺3,李根玉1,张彦芳1,田红军1,贺力男1,郭爱武1,伊敬东1,王志勇1,杜丽欣1,张佳丽1,李建梅1,许素娟1,吴红恩1,翟晓薇1,张伟1,高丽1,杨丽梅1,付宝忠1   

  1. 1 河北省衡水市衡水市第五人民医院2台湾马偕纪念医院神经科 台北科技大学机电科技研究所3华中科技大学同济医学院公共卫生学院流行病学与卫生统计系
  • 收稿日期:2011-01-10 修回日期:2010-12-10 出版日期:2011-08-20 发布日期:2011-08-20
  • 通讯作者: 付广荣

Validation and Modification of the Essen Stroke Risk Scale in Stroke Patients of China

FU Guang-Rong,YUAN Wei-Qiang, CHEN Pei-Hao, et al   

  • Received:2011-01-10 Revised:2010-12-10 Online:2011-08-20 Published:2011-08-20
  • Contact: FU Guang-Rong

摘要: 目的 在非心房颤动型卒中患者中,验证艾森卒中风险评分量表(Essen Stroke Risk Score,ESRS)预测卒中复发的准确性,将艾森卒中量表给予改良,并对改良后的艾森量表进行验证。方法 分析连续住院治疗的510例脑梗死患者的资料,依照艾森卒中量表给予评分,1年后随访到468例患者,按照随访结果将其分为复发组和未复发组,将复发组和未复发组中的各个危险因素进行比较,根据结果,去掉无效题目,将艾森量表给予精简,并评价艾森量表和精简后的艾森量表的预测卒中复发的准确性。结果 复发组201例和未复发组267例中,艾森卒中风险评分量表中的高血压(P=0.0010)、心脏病(P=0.0162)、吸烟(P=0.0220)、既往短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血卒中(P=0.0000)的比例差异有统计学意义,糖尿病在复发组和未复发组中的比例差异无统计学意义(P=0.07)。年龄(P=0.2565) 、既往心肌梗死(P=0.5072)和外周动脉病(P=0.1578)的比例在两组患者中的差异无统计学意义。精简的Essen量表删去了年龄、既往心肌梗死、外周动脉病3个无效的题目。精简的Essen量表预测卒中复发的受试者的工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线下面积为0.645[95%(confidence interval,CI):0.596~0.695],完整的Essen量表预测卒中复发的ROC曲线下面积为0.650(95%CI: 0.601~0.699),均大于基准线的面积,两者的差异无统计学意义(P=0.8875)。结论 Essen量表可以用于预测卒中的复发,精简的Essen量表可以达到与完整的Essen量表相近的预测效果。

关键词: 卒中; 量表; 复发; 验证; 预测

Abstract: Objective To retrospectively validate the prediction of the essen stroke risk score(ESRS) in non-atrial fibrillation patients with acute ischemic stroke hospitalized in a stroke unit of China, to modify it, and to investigate the prediction of the streamlined ESRS.Methods Five hundred and ten hospitalized patients with acute cerebral infarction were collected within 24 hours, and clinical follow-up were available in 468 cases after 12 months. The ESRS were analyzed in accordance with the follow-up results and were divided into recurrence group and the non-recurrence group. Basic demographic information and various risk factors were compared via statistical analysis in both groups. We modified the ESRS and validated the stroke recurrence rate of the ESRS with the streamlined ESRS.Results In recurrence group(N=201) and the non-recurrence group(N=267), four risk factors of ESRS, including hypertension(P=0.0010), other heart disease(P=0.0162), smoking(P=0.0220),and previous transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke, (P=0.0000) had significant difference (P<0.05). Three other risk factors, age(P=0.2565), previous myocardial infarction(P=0.5072), peripheral arterial disease(P=0.1578), showed no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The differences of recurrence rate in diabetic patient group and non-diabetic patient group closely reached to statistical significance(P=0.07). The area under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curve of the streamlined ESRS predicting the recurrence rate of stroke was 0.645(95%CI:0.596~0.695) and the area under ROC curve of the complete ESRS was 0.650(95%CI:0.601~0.699). The difference was not statistically significant(P=0.8875>0.05).Conclusion In this study, the ESRS and the streamlined ESRS could predict the recurrence of stroke, which achieved similar prediction accuracies.

Key words: Stroke; Scale; Recurrence; Validation; Forecasting