Abstract:

Objective To get insight into the advantages and disadvantages of hospital development through discipline evaluation. Methods We make a SWOT analysis according to strength, weakness, opportunity and constraint factors, through assessment for 39 clinical medical subjects of Beijing Tiantan Hospital in 2012, and compare it with the evaluation data in 2006 and 2009. Results In 2006 and 2009, the number of subjects with 600 points or more is 2 and 9 respectively, while the number of subjects increases to 14 in 2012. Medical treatment, scientific research, teaching, discipline team and supporting conditions have been improved significantly. In discipline evaluations in 2006, 2009, 2012, cerebrovascular disease subjects in neurology and neurosurgery have always taken the first two place, as obviously advantageous discipline. Conclusion The subject level of our hospital has been well-developed generally, and cerebrovascular disease has always been the preponderant discipline.

Key words: Discipline evaluation; Cerebrovascular disease; Development

摘要：

目的 通过学科评估了解医院学科发展的优势与不足。 方法 2012年对首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院39个临床医学学科进行评估，与2006年和2009年 的评估数据进行比较，并对评估结果进行优势、劣势、机会和制约（strengths weakness opportunity threats，SWOT）分析。 结果 2006年和2009年学科评估中≥600分的学科分别为2个和9个，2012年学科评估≥600分的学 科增加到14个，学科评估中医疗、科研、教学、学科队伍和支撑条件等各个指标均得到了显著提升。 神经内外科的脑血管病专业在3次评估中一直占前两位，学科优势明显。 结论 我院学科水平整体发展势头良好，脑血管专业一直是优势学科。

关键词: 学科评估; 脑血管病; 发展