急性缺血性卒中患者多维认知功能评估研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的了解急性缺血性卒中患者多维认知功能特点，为选择全面的、系统的评估工具提供参考根据。方法本研究为横断面研究，连续入组2013年8月～2014年4月第二炮兵总医院神经内科门诊和住院发病14 d内的急性缺血性卒中44例，选取年龄、性别、教育水平匹配的无缺血性卒中者44例为对照组。采用简易精神状态检查量表（Mini-Mental State Examination，MMSE）、中文版蒙特利尔认知评估量表（Montreal Congnitive Assessment，MoCA）、多维心理评估系统对急性缺血性卒中组和对照组进行认知评估。结果急性缺血性卒中组与对照组在下列测验中差异无显著性：选择反应时测验（27.16±5.02 vs 28.34±5.66；P =0.347）、瑞文推理测验（12.13±5.81 vs 14.91±7.03；P =0.643）、数字序列推理测验（8.68±5.23 vs 11.43±4.76；P =0.287）、词语记忆能力测验（50.98±19.97 vs 56.78±15.89； P =0.316）、言语工作记忆测验（正向）（6.88±1.91 vs 7.23±1.62；P =0.178）、言语工作记忆（反向）（4.31±1.76 vs 5.23±2.13；P =0.922）、语义流畅性测验（11.37±2.65 vs 13.27±1.65；P =0.142）；急性缺血性卒中组在简单计算测验（28.95±15.86 vs 41.26±9.32；P =0.007）、数量大小比较测验（65.75±19.22 vs 79.43±8.62；P =0.008）、空间工作记忆测验（69.63±28.97 vs 83.16±7.23； P =0.004）、图片记忆测验（58.39±18.13 vs 68.64±9.13；P =0.009）、词语辨析测验（20.16±8.22 vs 29.43±5.27；P =0.008）、颜色判断Stroop测验（执行功能）（65.37±22.79 vs 70.83±4.16； P =0.000）上显著低于对照组。结论多维认知功能测查表明急性缺血性卒中患者仅存在局部认知功能受损，能够更详细地反映患者的认知状况。

文章导读： 初步探讨了急性缺血性卒中患者多维认知功能特点，为选择全面的、系统的评估工具提供参考根
据。

关键词: 缺血性卒中; 多维; 认知功能; 评估

Abstract:

Objective To study the characteristics of multi-dimensional cognitive function of acute ischemic stroke patient, which can be used as a reference for comprehensive assessment. Methods Eighty eight consecutive patients at Department of Neurology of the Second Artillery General Hospital were prospectively enrolled into this study. The patients were divided into two groups:patients with acute ischemic stroke (44) and control group (44) whose age, gender, education level were well matched. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Congnitive Assessmen (MoCA) and Multi-dimensional Cognitive Function test were used to assess the cognitive function. Results No significant differences are revealed between the acute ischemic stroke group and the reference group in Choice Reaction Time Test (27.16±5.02 vs 28.34±5.66, P =0.347), Raven Standard Reasoning Test (12.13±5.81 vs 14.91±7.03, P =0.643), Number Sequence Reasoning Test (8.68±5.23 vs 11.43±4.76, P =0.287), Word Memory Test (50.98±19.97 vs 56.78±15.89, P =0.316), Word Working Memory Test (6.88±1.91 vs 7.23±1.62, P =0.178), Verbal Fluency Test (11.37±2.65 vs 13.27±1.65, P =0.142). The score between two groups in terms of Simple Computation Test (28.95±15.86 vs 41.26±9.32, P =0.007), Number Comparison Test (65.75±19.22 vs 79.43±8.62,

P =0.008), Spatial Working Memory Test (69.63±28.97 vs 83.16±7.23, P =0.004), Picture Memory Test (58.39±18.13 vs 68.64±9.13, P =0.009), Word Discriminating Test (20.16±8.22 vs 29.43±5.27, P =0.008), Stroop Test (65.37±22.79 vs 70.83±4.16, P =0.000) demonstrated a statistical significance. Conclusion The multi-dimensional cognitive function assessment system reflects that there is local impaired cognitive function in individual cognitive level. It could reflect the cognitive condition of patients in detail

Key words: Ischemic stroke; Multi-dimensional; Cognitive function; Assessment

袁莉1，李秋俐1，尹世敏1，程大志2，冯枫1，王磊1. 急性缺血性卒中患者多维认知功能评估研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2014, 9(06): 466-471.

YUAN Li, LI Qiu-Li, YIN Shi-Min, CHENG Da-Zhi, FENG Feng, WANG Lei.. Study on Multi-dimensional Cognitive Function Assessment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2014, 9(06): 466-471.

参考文献

参考文献

1 Nys GM, Van Zandvoort MJ, De Kort PL, et al.

Restrictions of the mini-mental state examination

in acute stroke[J]. Arch Clin Neurol Psychol, 2005,

20:623-629.

2 周楷. 非关键部位缺血性卒中急性期认知功能障碍特

点的研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学, 2013.

3 Xu WL, Qiu CX, Wahlin A, et al. Diabetes mellitus

and risk of dementia in the Kungsholmen Project:a

6-year follow-up Study[J]. Neurology, 2004, 63:1181.

4 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组急性缺血性

脑卒中诊治指南撰写组. 中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治

指南2010[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2010, 43:146-152.

5 Wind AW, Schellevis FG, Van Staveren, et al.

Limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination

in diagnosing dementia in general practice[J]. Int J

Geriatr Psychiatry, 1997, 12:101-108.

6 Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The

Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA:a brief

screening tool for mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Am

Geriatr Soc, 2005, 53:695-699.

7 Gabrieli JD, Poldrack RA, Desmond JE. The role

of left prefrontal cortex in language and memory[J].

Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95:906-913.

8 Brewer JB, Zhao Z, Desmond J E, et al. Making

memories:brain activity that predicts how well visual

experience will be remembered[J]. Science, 1998,

281:1185-1187.

9 Wechsler D. Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for children, revised[M]. New York:Psychological

Corp, 1974:13-28.

10 Corsi P. Human memory and the medical temporal

region of the brain[D]. Montreal:McGill University,

1972.

11 So D, Siegel L. Learning to read Chinese:Semantic,

syntactic, phonological and working memory skills

in normally achieving and poor Chinese readers[J].

Reading and Writing, 1997, 9:1-21.

12 Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal

reactions[J]. J Exp Psychol, 1935, 18:643-662.

13 Monsch AU, Bondi MW, Butters N, et al. Comparisons

of verbal fluency tasks in the detection of dementia of

the Alzheimer type[J]. Arch Neurol, 1992, 49:1253-

1258.

14 王拥军. 脑血管疾病与认知功能障碍[J]. 中华内科杂

志, 2005, 44:872-873.

15 林琬. 脑梗塞患者急性期认知功能损害的临床研究

[D]. 广州:汕头大学, 2010.

16 Zukic S, Mrkonjic Z, Sinanovic O, et al. Gerstmann's

syndrome in acute stroke patients[J]. Acta Inform

Med, 2012, 20:242-243.

17 陈文利, 符浩, 吴昆华, 等. 脑梗死患者梗死部位和数

量与认知功能损害的相关性研究[J]. 中华行为医学与

脑科学杂志, 2012, 21:580-583.

18 Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, et al. Cognitive

per formance af ter f i rst ever st roke related to

progression of vascular brain damage:a 2 year follow

up CT scan study[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,

2005, 76:1075-1079.

19 王力. Parkinson病、Alzheimer病和脑梗塞病人记忆

损害特征的研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2003.

20 Yassuda MS, Flaks MK, Viola LF, et al. Psychometric

characteristics of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory

Test (RBMT) as an early detection instrument for

dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Brazil[J].

Int Psychoger, 2010, 22:1003-1011.

21 张云燕. 脑梗塞认知功能损害的临床研究[D]. 北京:中

国人民解放军军事医学科学院, 2007.

22 Bersano A, Burgio F, Gattinoni M, et al. Aphasia

burden to hospitalised acute stroke patients:need for

an early rehabilitation programme[J]. Int J Stroke,

2009, 4:443-447.

23 周楷, 王群. 急性缺血性脑卒中记忆障碍特点的研究

[J]. 重庆医学, 2011, 42:1338-1339, 1344.

24 王展, 洪霞, 魏镜, 等. 非关键部位脑梗死患者的认知

功能损伤研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2009, 4:194-200.

25 Hall JR, Harvey M, Vo HT, et al. Performance on a

measure of category fluency incognitively impaired

elde rly[J ]. Neu ropsychol Dev Cog n B Aging

Neuropsychol Cogn, 2011, 18:353-361.

26 Desmond DW. The neuropsychology of vascular

cognitive impairment:is there a specific cognitive

deficit?[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2004, 226:3-7.

[1]	马俊雯, 拜承萍. 血清炎症因子、脑血管反应性与短暂性脑缺血发作患者认知障碍的关系 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(12): 1314-1320.
[2]	周甜甜, 苏文杰, 连松勇, 林友聪. 丰富环境对卒中后血管性痴呆患者认知功能的影响 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(12): 1343-1349.
[3]	吴娱倩, 张玉梅, 范小伟, 王安心, 逄文斌. 运动想象-动觉治疗对缺血性卒中患者手功能康复效果的研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(12): 1366-1371.
[4]	伊珞, 周宏宇, 仇鑫, 李子孝, 王拥军. 动脉粥样硬化性疾病的DNA甲基化改变[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1163-1170.
[5]	王誉博, 李子孝, 王拥军. 表观遗传学与缺血性卒中后氧化应激的相关性研究进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1171-1177.
[6]	崔凌云, 仇鑫, 周宏宇, 李子孝, 王拥军. DNA甲基化与2型糖尿病的相关性研究进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1183-1188.
[7]	张冉, 蔡卫新, 王秀秀, 袁媛. 压力性损伤智能化“评估-决策-控制”系统在脑血管病重症患者中的应用 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1198-1202.
[8]	刘光亮, 韩凯月, 苏文龙, 张皓. 不同强度有氧踏车训练对不同病程缺血性卒中患者运动和心肺适能的影响 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1203-1208.
[9]	徐莹鑫, 张爽, 周晓梅, 袁景林, 赵留庄, 杨海华. 非狭窄性颈动脉斑块与前循环不明原因栓塞性卒中的相关性研究 [J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(11): 1233-1237.
[10]	程实, 李静, 郭军平, 胡爱香, 于鑫玮, 韩玮, 梁瑛, 张越巍, 冀瑞俊. 急性卒中患者住院期间感染的临床特征及危险因素分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1065-1070.
[11]	向薇, 徐璐瑶, 张曼曼, 魏红春, 梁志刚. 缺血性卒中急性期磁敏感加权成像不对称突出静脉征的发生率及影响因素分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1097-1102.
[12]	赵永瑞, 刘展会. 弥散张量成像在缺血性卒中患者运动功能预后评估中的研究进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1114-1119.
[13]	张伯煜, 郭玉成, 崔玉霞, 李英丽, 吕雨梅. 急性缺血性卒中患者就医行为决策现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1127-1132.
[14]	吴亭亭, 刘亚飞, 闫世曦, 武一平, 张忠波, 张邯菲, 房娉平. “互联网+”在急性缺血性卒中救治中的应用进展[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(10): 1133-1138.
[15]	徐蔚海, 李顺, 程安琪. 青年卒中的诊治：勿过激[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2022, 17(09): 915-918.