中国卒中杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03): 196-201.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

脑白质病变患者认知功能的前瞻性研究

孙丽伟,周卫东,刘承浩,杨芳,王君,尹晓明,刘长春,郝丽梅,万继峰,任歆,曾庆玉   

  1. 1 100028 北京北京市煤炭总医院神经内科
    2 北京市煤炭总医院影像科
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-10 出版日期:2016-03-20 发布日期:2016-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 周卫东 mtzyyneuro@163.com

Prospective Study of Cognitive Function in Patients with White Matter Lesions

  • Received:2015-07-10 Online:2016-03-20 Published:2016-03-20

摘要:

目的 探讨不同部位和严重程度脑白质病变(white matter lesions,WMLs)患者的认知功能损害特点。 方法 前瞻性纳入179例WMLs病例和97例磁共振成像(magnetic resonance imaging,MRI)正常对照组, 并收集人口学资料,对WMLs的严重程度进行Fazekas视觉等级评分,依据WMLs病变部位分为皮质下脑 白质病变(subcortical white matter lesions,SWML)组、脑室旁脑白质病变(periventricular lesions,PVL)组 和混合组,采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale,MoCA)分析不同部位和 严重程度WMLs的认知功能差异。根据MoCA将WMLs组分为WMLs认知损害亚组(116例)及WMLs认知正 常亚组(63例),分析探讨WMLs患者认知损害的危险因素。 结果 与正常组比,WMLs组在MoCA总分(P ﹤0.001)、视空间与执行能力(P ﹤0.001)、命名(P =0.019)、 语言(P =0.005)、抽象理解(P =0.003)、延迟记忆(P ﹤0.001)方面显著性减低。Fazekas分级越高, MoCA总分及各项评分显著减低(P均﹤0.05)。PVL组、SWML组和混合组与对照组相比,在MoCA总分(P 均﹤0.001)、视空间与执行能力(P 均﹤0.001)、语言(P =0.006,0.022,0.008)、抽象理解(P =0.003, 0.011,0.016)及延迟记忆(P均﹤0.001)上差异有统计学意义。WMLs亚组分析显示高教育程度是WMLs发 生认知损害的保护因素。 结论 高教育程度是WMLs患者认知损害的保护因素。WMLs患者在视空间与执行功能、延迟回忆方面 存在明显的认知损害。WMLs病变程度越严重,认知功能下降越显著。皮质下WMLs、脑室旁WMLs及混 合组均在视空间与执行能力、语言、抽象理解、延迟记忆方面损害严重。

文章导读: 通过前瞻性病例对照研究和多因素分析显示脑白质病变患者在视空间与执行功能、延迟记忆方面存在明显的认知损害,教育程度较高是脑白质病变认知功能的保护因素。

关键词: 脑白质病变; 脑白质疏松; 认知功能; 蒙特利尔认知评估; 阈值效应

Abstract:

Objective To explore the characteristics of cognitive function in the patients with different locations of lesions and severity degrees of white matter lesions (WMLs). Methods A total of 179 WMLs cases and 97 normal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) control cases were included prospectively and demographic information was collected. According to the locations of lesions, WMLs were classified into 3 subgroups: subcortical white matter lesions (SWML), periventricular lesions (PVL) group and mixed legions group. Fazekas visual ratings were administered to evaluate the severity of WMLs. Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) was used to evaluate the cognitive function differences among different locations of lesions and severity degrees of WMLs. According to MoCA, WMLs group can be divided into subgroups WMLs cognitive impairment (116 cases) and the WMLs cognitively normal group (63 cases). The analysis of risk factors for cognitive impairment of patients with WMLs was performed and discussed. Results Total MoCA scores (P ﹤0.001), visual space execution ability (P ﹤0.001), named (P =0.019), language (P =0.005), abstract understanding (P =0.003) and delayed memory (P ﹤0.001) of WMLs group was significantly lower than those of control groups, respectively. The higher Fazekas classification, the significantly lower MoCA scores and the scores of all items (P ﹤0.05). Compared with control group, the MoCA scores (all P ﹤0.001), visual space execution ability (P ﹤0.001), language (P =0.006, 0.022, 0.008), abstract understanding (P =0.003, 0.011, 0.016) and delayedmemory (all P ﹤0.001) of PVL group, the SWML group and mixed group had significant statistical differences. WMLs subgroup analysis showed that the high level of education was a protection factor for cognitive impairment WMLs. Conclusion High education is the protection factor for cognitive impairment in WMLs patients. The visual space execution ability, delayed memory are more obviously impaired in WMLs patients. The higher severity level of WMLs lesions, the more distinct decrease of the cognitive function. SWML WMLs, PVL WMLs and mixed groups have severe damage in the visual space and execution ability, language, abstract understanding, and delayed memory.

Key words: White matter lesion; Leukoaraiosis; Cognitive impairment; Montreal Cognitive
Assessment;
Threshold effect