中国卒中杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (12): 1205-1208.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2019.12.002

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

优化溶栓流程对轻型急性缺血性卒中院内延误及预后的影响

王耀辉,张重阳,孙伟,吕喆,刘维斌   

  1. 066000 秦皇岛市第一医院急诊科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-12 出版日期:2019-12-20 发布日期:2019-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 张重阳 qhddyyyjzk@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    河北省重点研发计划项目(172777202)

Effect of Optimized Thrombolysis Treatment Workflow on In-hospital Delay and Prognosis in Acute Mild Ischemic Stroke

  • Received:2019-10-12 Online:2019-12-20 Published:2019-12-20

摘要:

目的 分析优化溶栓流程对轻型急性缺血性卒中患者院内延误及预后的影响。 方法 回顾性收集秦皇岛市第一医院2015年7月-2017年6月行静脉溶栓治疗的轻型缺血性卒中患者 资料。按照流程优化时间前后,分为优化组和对照组。比较两组入院到溶栓时间(door to needle time, DNT)、溶栓后7 d NIHSS评分和溶栓后3个月mRS评分。 结果 共纳入57例轻型缺血性卒中患者,平均年龄61.7±5.4岁,男性44例(77.2%)。其中对照组 24例,优化组33例。两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义。与对照组比较,优化组DNT缩短 (68.7±19.1 vs 88.8±23.1 mi n,P =0.001),DNT≤60 min的患者比例更高(42.4% vs 12.5%,P =0.015); 溶栓治疗后3个月mRS评分更低[0(0~0.5)vs 0.5(0~2),P =0.017],良好预后(mRS评分≤1分)患者 比例更高(87.9% vs 62.5%,P =0.024)。 结论 优化溶栓流程可以缩短轻型急性缺血性卒中患者的DNT,提高DNT≤60 mi n达标率,改善患者 3个月预后。

文章导读: 优化溶栓流程可缩短轻型急性缺血性卒中患者的DNT,提高DNT≤60 mi n达标率,并改善患者预后。

关键词: 轻型卒中; 溶栓流程; 院内延误; 预后

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effect of optimized thrombolysis treatment workflow on door to needle time (DNT) and prognosis in acute mild ischemic stroke patients with intravenous thrombolysis. Methods Data of mild ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis from July 2015 to June 2017 in the First Qinhuangdao Hospital were retrospectively collected. According to whether thrombolysis treatment workflow was optimized or not, all patients were divided into the optimization group and the control group. Door to needle time (DNT), NIHSS score at 7 days and mRS score at 3 months after thrombolysis of two groups were compared. Results A total of 57 mild ischemic stroke patients were included, with a mean age of 61.7±5.4 years old and 44 males (77.2%). There were 33 patients in optimization group and 24 patients in control group. The general information had no statistical difference between the two groups. DNT was shorter (68.7±19.1 vs 88.8±23.1 min, P =0.001), the percentage of patients with DNT ≤60 min was higher (42.4% vs 12.5%, P =0.015), the mRS score at 3 months was lower [0 (0-0.5) vs 0.5 (0- 2), P =0.017], and the rate of patients with mRS score ≤1 at 3 months was higher (87.9% vs 62.5%, P =0.024) in optimization group, compared with that in control group. Conclusions The optimized thrombolysis treatment workflow can shorten DNT, improve the rate of DNT ≤60 min, and improve 90-day prognosis in patients with acute mild ischemic stroke.

Key words: Mild stroke; Thrombolysis treatment workflow; In-hospital delay; Prognosis