Chinese Journal of Stroke ›› 2021, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (08): 864-872.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.08.020
Previous Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
蒙世佼, 卓滋泽, 许蓉, 任依
通讯作者:
基金资助:
Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) in cerebrovascular disease clinical teaching in China. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PBL and LBL in cerebrovascular disease clinical teaching were retrieved from Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, VIP Information Chinese Journal Service Platform) from inception to May 2021. Revman 5.4 and Stata 15.0 were used for meta analysis and publication
bias detection. By using standard mean difference (SMD) or RR and 95%CI , the teaching efficacy
of PBL and LBL were compared through examination scores (theoretical knowledge, case analysis and skill operation), questionnaire scoring items (medical knowledge development, doctor-patient communication ability, clinical practice ability, clinical thinking ability, team cooperation ability, autonomous learning ability) and teaching satisfaction. Results A total of 25 RCTs involving 1493 participants were included, of them, 747 in PBL group and 746 in LBL group. The examination scores of theoretical knowledge (SMD 1.41, 95%CI 0.79- 2.02, P <0.001), case analysis (SMD 1.74, 95%CI 0.84-2.64, P <0.001) and skill operation (SMD 3.35, 95%CI 1.09-5.60, P =0.004) in PBL group were superior to those in LBL group (P <0.001). The questionnaire scores of medical knowledge development (SMD 1.08, 95%CI 0.53-1.62, P <0.001), doctor-patient communication ability (SMD 3.07, 95%CI 2.07-4.07, P <0.001), clinical practice ability (SMD 2.55, 95%CI 1.33-3.78, P <0.001), clinical thinking ability (SMD 3.02, 95%CI 0.99- 5.06, P =0.004), team cooperation ability (SMD 1.64, 95%CI 1.19-2.08, P <0.001), autonomous learning ability (SMD 2.35, 95%CI 1.20-3.50, P <0.001) in PBL group were superior to that in LBL group. The teaching satisfaction (RR 1.18, 95%CI 1.10-1.26, P <0.001) in PBL group was also superior to that in LBL model. Except for the homogeneity of teaching satisfaction (P =0.23, I 2=29%), the other outcome indicators were heterogeneous (P ≤0.1 or I 2≥50%). There was no statistical significance of publication bias for theoretical knowledge score, case analysis score, skill operation score, teaching satisfaction and questionnaire score of medical knowledge development, while there was statistical significance of publication bias for other outcome indicators. Conclusions Based on the existing evidence, PBL method was more effective than LBL method in cerebrovascular diseases clinical teaching in China. However, the risk of bias and heterogeneity of included studies should not be ignored, and more higher quality multicenter studies are needed to further confirm the above conclusions.
Key words: Problem-based learning; Lecture-based learning ; Cerebrovascular disease; Clinical teaching; Meta analysis
摘要: 目的 系统评价基于问题学习(problem-based learning,PBL)和传统的授课式学习(lecture-based learning,LBL)教学模式在我国脑血管病学临床教学中的应用效果。 方法 检索中文数据库(中国期刊全文数据库、万方数据知识服务平台、维普资讯中文期刊服务 平台)中关于脑血管病临床教学应用PBL和LBL的随机对照试验,时间范围为自建库至2021年5月。使 用Revman 5.4和Stata 15.0进行meta分析和发表偏倚检测。采用标准化均数差(standardized mean difference,SMD)或RR及其95%CI来评价PBL和LBL的考核成绩(理论知识、病例分析和技能操作), 问卷评分项目(医学知识拓展、医患沟通能力、临床实践能力、临床思维能力、团队协作能力、自主学 习能力)和教学满意度等教学效果。 结果 共纳入25项随机对照试验,学员1493人,其中PBL组747人,LBL组746人。PBL组的理论知 识(SMD 1.41,95%CI 0.79~2.02,P <0.001)、病例分析(SMD 1.74,95%CI 0.84~2.64,P <0.001)、技 能操作(SMD 3.35,95%CI 1.09~5.60,P =0.004)的考核成绩均优于LBL组。PBL组的医学知识拓展 (SMD 1.08,95%CI 0.53~1.62,P <0.001)、医患沟通能力(SMD 3.07,95%CI 2.07~4.07,P <0.001)、临 床实践能力(SMD 2.55,95%CI 1.33~3.78,P <0.001)、临床思维能力(SMD 3.02,95%CI 0.99~5.06, P =0.004)、团队协作能力(SMD 1.64,95%CI 1.19~2.08,P <0.001)、自主学习能力(SMD 2.35,95%CI 1.20~3.50,P <0.001)的问卷评分均高于LBL组。PBL组的教学满意度(RR 1.18,95%CI 1.10~1.26, P <0.001)也优于LBL组。除教学满意度(P =0.23,I 2=29%)具有同质性,其余结局指标均具有异质性 (P≤0.1或I 2≥50%)。理论知识成绩、病例分析成绩、技能操作成绩、教学满意度、医学知识拓展问卷 评分的发表偏倚无统计学意义,其余结局指标的发表偏倚有统计学意义。 结论 基于现有证据,在我国脑血管病临床教学中,PBL比LBL的教学效果更优,但纳入研究的偏倚 风险和异质性不可忽视,需更高质量的多中心研究来进一步证实上述结论。
关键词: 基于问题学习; 授课式学习; 脑血管病; 教学; 荟萃分析
MENG Shi-Jiao, ZHUO Zi-Ze, XU Rong, REN Yi. Meta Analysis on Efficacy Comparison between Problem-Based Learning and Lecture-Based Learning inCerebrovascular Disease Clinical Teaching in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2021, 16(08): 864-872.
蒙世佼, 卓滋泽, 许蓉, 任依. 基于问题学习与授课式学习教学模式对我国脑血管病学临床教学效果的meta分析[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2021, 16(08): 864-872.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.08.020
http://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V16/I08/864
[12] 牟晓洋,吴晓辉,李栋良,等. CBL结合PBL教学法
在社区医师脑卒中急救培训中的应用[J]. 卫生职业 教育,2016,34(12):142-144. [13] 胡仲红,辛国栋,杨亚喆. 以问题为基础教学法在急 性脑血管病合并肺炎教学中的应用研究[J]. 课程教 育研究,2016,5(31):241-242. [14] 陆逸莹,王长德,冯蓓蕾. 中西医结合脑血管病PBL 临床教学法的应用[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2017,15(17):4-5. [15] 刘锐. 以问题为基础的学习在脑血管病科临床教学 中的应用探究[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2017,9(1): 32-33. [16] 蔡丽朋,童燕娜,肖淑英,等. PBL教学法在脑卒中 临床实习中的应用[J]. 科教导刊(下旬),2017,9 (12):87-88,90. [17] 韩晶,徐海. 在康复科进修医生培训中PBL教学模 式的应用效果分析[J]. 中国卫生产业,2017,14(32): 12-13. [18] 陈晓霖,叶迅,王昊,等. 以问题为基础教学法在脑 动静脉畸形外科治疗临床教学中的应用[J]. 中国卒 中杂志,2017,12(3):291-293. [19] 张婧,濮月华,于丹丹,等. 以问题为基础教学法在 脑动脉夹层临床教学中的应用[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2017,12(5):468-470. [20] 林属芳. 以问题为基础的教学法在脑卒中患者院前 急救教学中的应用[J]. 当代护士(下旬刊),2018,25 (3):142-144. [21] 吕瑞娟,王群. 以问题为基础学习教学法在进修医师 急性脑血管病合并癫痫发作教学中的应用[J]. 中国 卒中杂志,2018,13(2):199-202. [22] 刘忠奎,田伟贵. 以问题为基础的学习在脑血管外科 临床教学中的应用价值分析[J]. 临床医药文献电子 杂志,2018,5(2):176-177. [23] 刘向荣,王伊龙. 以问题为基础教学法对提高脑血 管病方向研究生科研能力的作用[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2018,13(6):642-644. [24] 程红亮,张闻东,胡培佳,等. PBL教学法在中西医结 合内科教学中的应用探讨[J]. 世界最新医学信息文 摘,2019,19(37):316-317. [25] 刘克婉,张立春,杨华荣. 以问题为基础的教学法在 对脑卒中患者的教学中的应用[J]. 饮食保健,2020,6 (43):275. [26] 曹妍. 分析PBL教学模式在脑卒中内科护理教学中 的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2020,12(23):33- 35. [27] 曹莉,黄斌英,黄添容,等. 以问题为导向的教学法 在脑卒中院前急救护理路径培训中的应用[J]. 现代 诊断与治疗,2021,32(2):303-304. [28] 张先慧. PBL教学法在脑血管意外康复教学中的应用 [J]. 黑龙江科学,2021,12(9):140-141. [29] 张长青,赵性泉,王春雪,等. 以问题为基础教学法 在急性缺血性脑血管病临床教学中的应用研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志,2019,14(2):188-190. [30] 董静思,李冰洁,林丹,等. 我国PBL教学模式在肿 瘤学临床教学中的效果及满意度的Meta分析[J]. 中 国循证医学杂志,2019,19(8):968-975. [31] 王桂芝,刘红,王莹,等. 我国PBL和LBL教学模式 的外科教学效果比较的Meta分析[J]. 中国循证医学 杂志,2013,13(11):1313-1317.