Development and Reliability and Validity Testing of the Intravenous Thrombolysis Intention Scale for Acute Ischemic Stroke

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2025.04.016

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To develop an intravenous thrombolysis intention scale for acute ischemic stroke and evaluate its reliability and validity.
Methods This study used the theory of planned behavior as a guiding framework, forming an initial draft of the scale through literature analysis, Delphi expert consultation, and pre-survey. From July to August 2023, a questionnaire survey was conducted at three screening sites for high-risk stroke populations in Zhengzhou, Henan province, and the scale was analyzed for item analysis, reliability testing, and structural validity assessment. From September to October 2023, another survey was conducted to carry out confirmatory factor analysis and criterion-related validity assessment.
Results The intravenous thrombolysis intention scale for acute ischemic stroke comprised one overall evaluation item and three dimensions, totaling 13 items. The content validity index at the scale level was 0.9. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors, contributing to a cumulative variance rate of 70.515% after rotation. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.904, the split-half reliability was 0.840, and the test-retest reliability was 0.872. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the scale demonstrated robust convergent and discriminant validity. The correlation coefficient between the overall scale score and the chronic disease health literacy scale score was 0.671 (P<0.001), and the correlation coefficient with respondents’ perceived risk of intracerebral hemorrhage complications after thrombolysis was -0.402 (P<0.001).
Conclusions The intravenous thrombolysis intention scale for acute ischemic stroke exhibits good reliability and validity, and can be used to assess the intention level of intravenous thrombolysis in cases of acute ischemic stroke.

Key words: Acute ischemic stroke; Intravenous thrombolysis; Intention; Scale development; Reliability; Validity

摘要： 目的编制急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓意向量表并对其信效度进行检验。
方法本研究以计划行为理论为指导框架，通过文献分析、德尔菲专家函询和预调查形成量表初稿。于2023年7—8月选取河南省郑州市3个卒中高危人群筛查点进行问卷调查，并对量表进行项目分析、信度检验及结构效度分析，2023年9—10月进行再次调查，对量表进行验证性因子分析和效标关联效度分析。
结果急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓意向量表共包括1个总评价条目和3个维度，共13个条目。量表水平的内容效度指数为0.9；探索性因子分析共提取3个公因子，旋转后累积方差贡献率为70.515%；量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.904，折半信度为0.840，重测信度为0.872；验证性因子分析结果显示，量表的聚合效度和区分效度良好；量表总分与慢性病患者健康素养量表得分的相关系数为0.671（P<0.001），与被调查者溶栓后脑出血并发症风险主观感知程度的相关系数为-0.402（P<0.001）。
结论急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓意向量表具有良好的信效度，可用于测量急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓意向水平。

关键词: 急性缺血性卒中; 静脉溶栓; 意向; 量表开发; 信度; 效度

CLC Number:

GUO Yuanli, GAO Renke, YANG Caixia, FAN Wenfeng, GUO Li’na, DONG Xiaofang, LYU Peihua, GAO Huanhuan, MA Keke. Development and Reliability and Validity Testing of the Intravenous Thrombolysis Intention Scale for Acute Ischemic Stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2025, 20(4): 511-518.

郭园丽, 高任轲, 杨彩侠, 范文凤, 郭丽娜, 董小方, 吕培华, 高欢欢, 马珂珂. 急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓意向量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2025, 20(4): 511-518.

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2025.04.016

https://www.chinastroke.org.cn/EN/Y2025/V20/I4/511

References

[1] 中华护理学会内科专业委员会，首都医科大学宣武医院. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓护理指南[J]. 中华护理杂志，2023，58（1）：10-15.
Internal Medicine Nursing Committee of Chinese Nursing Association，Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University. Nursing guidelines for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke[J]. Chin J Nurs，2023，58（1）：10-15.
[2] WANG Y J，LI S Y，PAN Y S，et al. Tenecteplase versus alteplase in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular events（TRACE-2）：a phase 3，multicentre，open-label，randomised controlled，non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet，2023，401（10377）：645-654.
[3] 郭园丽，杨彩侠，郭丽娜，等. 急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓代理决策者的决策困境及影响因素[J]. 中华护理杂志，2023，58（1）：23-30.
GUO Y L，YANG C X，GUO L N，et al. The decisional conflict and influence factors of proxies of patients with acute ischemic stroke in thrombolysis decision-making[J]. Chin J Nurs，2023，58（1）：23-30.
[4] BOSNJAK M，AJZEN I，SCHMIDT P. The theory of planned behavior：selected recent advances and applications[J]. Eur J Psychol，2020，16（3）：352-356.
[5] 郭园丽，马珂珂，杨彩侠，等. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者及代理决策者溶栓决策的质性研究[J]. 护理学杂志，2021，36（16）：43-46.
GUO Y L，MA K K，YANG C X，et al. Decision-making of thrombolytic therapy among acute ischemic stroke patients and their surrogates：a qualitative study[J]. Journal of Nursing Science，2021，36（16）：43-46.
[6] DE LUCA E，SENA B，CATALDI S，et al. A Delphi survey of health education system and interprofessional nurse’ role[J/OL]. Nurse Educ Today，2021，99：104779[2025-01-05]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104779.
[7] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会脑卒中筛查与防治工程委员会. 卒中筛查与防治技术规范[J]. 中华神经科杂志，2014，47（3）：199-203.
National Health and Family Planning Commission Stroke Screening and Prevention Engineering Committee. Technical specifications for stroke screening and prevention[J]. Chin J Neurol，2014，47（3）：199-203.
[8] 袁中清，王佳琳，金曼，等. 护士心理资本量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志，2023，58（1）：74-80.
YUAN Z Q，WANG J L，JIN M，et al. Development and reliability and validity of a psychological capital scale for nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs，2023，58（1）：74-80.
[9] 李灿，辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计，2008，25（5）：541-544.
LI C，XIN L. A study of methods for evaluating the reliability and validity of survey questionnaires[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Statistics，2008，25（5）：541-544.
[10] 孙浩林，彭慧，傅华. 慢性病患者健康素养量表信效度的研究[J]. 复旦学报（医学版），2012，39（3）：268-272.
SHUN H L，PENG H，FU H. The reliabililty and consistency of health literacy scale for chronic patients[J]. Fudan Univ J Med Sci，2012，39（3）：268-272.
[11] 刘欢，安立仁. 基于计划行为理论的知识隐藏行为拓展模型构建[J]. 科技进步与对策，2023，40（2）：132-140.
LIU H，AN L R. Construction of extended model of knowledge hiding behavior based on TPB[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy，2023，40（2）：132-140.
[12] 董望梅，彭小祥，肖祎男，等. 2020—2021年湖北省急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓率和血管内治疗率分析[J]. 卒中与神经疾病，2023，30（4）：348-351.
DONG W M，PENG X X，XIAO Y N，et al. Analysis of intravenous thrombolysis rate and endovascular treatment rate in acute ischemic stroke in Hubei province in 2020—2021[J]. Stroke and Nervous Diseases，2023，30（4）：348-351.
[13] 王艳淑，王则托，贾存玮，等. 多中心老年急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓占比及院前延迟原因分析[J]. 中华老年心脑血管病杂志，2023，25（3）：272-275.
WANG Y S，WANG Z T，JIA C W，et al. Proportion of intravenous thrombolysis in elderly patients with aute ischemic stroke and causes of prehospital delay：a multicenter study[J]. Chin J Geriatr Heart Brain Vessel Dis，2023，25（3）：272-275.
[14] 陈霞，范冬冬，储友群，等. 急性缺血性脑卒中患者静脉溶栓现况及院前延迟的影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报，2016，23（21）：1-4.
CHEN X，FAN D D，CHU Y Q，et al. Current status of intravenous thrombolysis and influence factors of pre-hospital delay among patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Journal of Nursing（China），2016，23（21）：1-4.
[15] 潘习，徐岚，李小勤，等. 护士参与的决策辅助方案在急性脑梗死静脉溶栓获取知情同意中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理，2019，19（12）：1904-1909.
PAN X，XU L，LI X Q，et al. Application of nurse involved in aid decision-making in informed consent for intravenous thrombolysis patients with acute cerebral infarction[J]. Chinese Nursing Management，2019，19（12）：1904-1909.
[16] 李百艳，米晓璐，朱保月，等. 紧急医疗救护系统联合静脉溶栓治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者预后的影响及院内延迟因素[J]. 中国急救医学，2025，45（3）：245-250.
LI B Y，MI X L，ZHU B Y，et al. Prognostic effect of EMS combined with intravenous thrombolysis on the patients with acute ischemic stroke and the analysis of delayed factors in hospital[J]. Chin J Crit Care Med，2025，45（3）：245-250.
[17] 吴燕妮，赵秋利，刘晓，等. 缺血性脑卒中高危者院前延迟行为意向现状调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国全科医学，2012，15（23）：2609-2612.
WU Y N，ZHAO Q L，LIU X，et al. Pre-hospital delay behavior intention in individuals at high risk for ischemic stroke[J]. Chinese General Practice，2012，15（23）：2609-2612.