Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Cardiopulmonary Fitness Assessment and Moderate to High Intensity Aerobic Training for Patients Recovering from Stroke
XIE Li’na, ZHU Jie, LI Qinying, LIU Chenghong, DEN Panmo, JIA Jie
2025, 20(1):
87-94.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2025.01.011
Asbtract
(
)
PDF (2040KB)
(
)
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of cardiopulmonary fitness assessment and moderate to high intensity aerobic training for patients recovering from stroke.
Methods Patients in the recovery phase of stroke (1 month≤duration≤12 months) who were admitted to the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Jing’an Branch of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University from December 2022 to September 2023, were consecutively included for cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Patients who completed the cardiopulmonary exercise testing were randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group. Both groups received conventional rehabilitation therapy (3 hours/day, 5 days/week for 4 weeks). At the same time, the intervention group was added with the moderate to high intensity aerobic training (40 minutes/time, 5 times/week) according to the cardiopulmonary fitness results in accordance with the exercise prescription, and the control group was added with the rehabilitation guidance (rehabilitation education, flexibility training, etc.) for the same duration. The daily living ability indicators [modified Barthel index (mBI)], motor function indicators [Fugl-Meyer assessment scale (FMA)], and balance function indicators[Berg balance scale (BBS)] between the two groups of patients before the experiment and four weeks after the experiment were compared. The peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) and peak work rate of the two groups were evaluated separately through cardiopulmonary exercise testing. At the same time, the incidence of adverse reactions and compliance of the two groups were compared.
Results In this study, 68 patients recovering from stroke were included. Among them, 13 cases (19.12%) did not complete the cardiopulmonary exercise testing, 5 cases (7.35%) experienced adverse reactions such as lower extremity pain, myocardial ischemia, hypertension, and arrhythmia during the evaluation, and 6 cases (8.82%) refused the follow-up trial. Finally, 44 cases (64.7%) who completed the cardiopulmonary exercise testing were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, with 22 cases in each group. Among them, 3 cases (13.64%) in the intervention group and 2 cases (9.09%) in the control group withdrew from the training due to adverse reactions such as lower extremity pain, palpitation, and dizziness during the treatment. No recurrence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, sudden death and other serious adverse events related to this study occurred in both groups. The attendance rate for all patients was 86.25% (759/880), with the intervention group at 88.41% (389/440) and the control group at 84.09% (370/440). Before the rehabilitation treatment, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in FMA (upper limb/lower limb), BBS, mBI, VO2peak, and peak work rate. After the rehabilitation treatment, the intervention group showed a significant improvement in ΔFMAlower limb[3.86 (2.00-5.25) points vs. 2.27 (1.00-3.25) points, P=0.016], ΔmBI[15.23 (5.00-25.00) points vs. 9.36 (5.00-11.25) points, P=0.025], ΔVO2peak[(3.78±3.49)mL/(kg·min) vs. (1.15±2.10) mL/(kg·min), P=0.004], and Δpeak work rate [(15.68±10.50) W vs. (7.05±10.20) W, P=0.008] compared to the control group. In addition, indicators for both groups like FMAupper limb (P<0.001), FMAlower limb (P<0.001), BBS (P<0.001), mBI (P<0.001), VO2peak (P<0.001), and peak work rate (P=0.006) were significantly improved compared with those before treatment.
Conclusions Conducting cardiopulmonary exercise testing and aerobic training for patients recovering from stroke is safe and feasible. Compared to conventional rehabilitation treatment, engaging in moderate to high intensity aerobic training can achieve greater benefits in terms of motor function and cardiopulmonary function of patients.