基于静息态脑电图的卒中后抑郁脑网络异常特征研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2020.05.002

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的基于静息态脑电图探索卒中后抑郁（post-stroke depression，PSD）脑网络特征异常改变，提取客观生物标志物。方法回顾性分析深圳市人民医院脑电数据库中缺血性卒中慢性期患者病例资料，收集静息态脑电图与汉密尔顿抑郁量表（Hamilton depression scale，HAMD）、MMSE及NIHSS评分资料。以HAMD评分 ≥20分为分界值，并通过病灶位置及体积匹配将患者分为PSD组和卒中后非抑郁（post stroke nondepression， PSND）组。脑电图数据预处理后，分别基于相干性虚部及能量包络在皮层源层面建立不同频段功能连接矩阵，采用基于网络的统计方法分析两组间差异。结果与PSND组比较，PSD组患者①基于相干性虚部的脑网络连接在δ频段减弱，以顶叶脑区连接减弱更明显；θ频段减弱，以左侧额顶颞枕、边缘叶及右侧额叶连接减弱更明显；γ频段增强，以左侧额叶、边缘叶及右侧顶叶脑区连接增强更明显；②基于能量包络的脑网络连接在α频段增强，以双侧顶枕叶脑区连接增强更明显。结论 PSD患者脑网络发生异常改变，静息态脑电图是揭示这种改变的有效工具。

文章导读： 本研究将静息态脑电源连接分析用于探索卒中后抑郁脑网络异常改变特征，并发现卒中后抑郁患者脑网络异常发生在不同脑电频段并广泛累及全脑不同脑区。

关键词: 静息态脑电图; 卒中后抑郁; 脑网络

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the changes of brain network and markers of post-stroke depression (PSD) by resting-state electroencephalogram (rsEEG). Methods The EEG data of patients with chronic cerebral infarction in Department of Neurology of Shenzhen People’s Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The rsEEG data and the scores of Hamilton depression scale (HAMD), MMSE and NIHSS were collected. Patients were divided into PSD group(HAMD score ≥20 points) and post-stroke non-depression group (PSND group, HAMD score <20 points), and the two groups were matched for the location and size of infarction. After preprocessing the EEG data, the functional connection matrices of different frequency bands were established at the cortical source level based on the imaginary part of coherency and the power envelope, and the differences between the two groups were analyzed using network-based statistical method. Results Compared with the PSND group, the patients in PSD group: (1) the brain network connection based on the imaginary part of coherency was weakened in the delta frequency band, especially in the parietal lobe; and decreased in the theta frequency band, especially in the left hemisphere, marginal lobe and the right frontal lobe; and enhanced in the gamma frequency band, especially in the left frontal lobe, marginal lobe and right parietal lobe; (2) the power envelopebased brain network connection was enhanced in the alpha frequency band, especially in bilateral parietal and occipital lobes. Conclusions Abnormal changes of the brain networks occurred in patients with post-stroke depression, and rsEEG was an effective tool to reveal the changes.

Key words: Resting state electroencephalography; Post-stroke depression; Brain network

党鸽，石雪，蔡敏，苏晓琳，陈思言，曾思琳，兰小勇，付学军，邹良玉，郭毅. 基于静息态脑电图的卒中后抑郁脑网络异常特征研究[J]. 中国卒中杂志, 2020, 15(05): 459-467.

DANG Ge, SHI Xue, CAI Min,SU Xiao-Lin, CHEN Si-Yan, ZENG Si-Lin, LAN Xiao-Yong, FU Xue-Jun, ZOU Liang-Yu, GUO Yi. Characteristics of Resting State Brain Network in Post-stroke Depression[J]. Chinese Journal of Stroke, 2020, 15(05): 459-467.

参考文献

[1] TOWFIGHI A，OVBIAGELE B，EL HUSSEINI N，et al.

Poststroke depression：a scientific statement for healthcare

professionals from the American Heart Association/

American Stroke Association[J/OL]. Stroke，2017，48

（2）：e30-e43[2020-04-15]. https：//doi.org/10.1161/

STR.0000000000000113.

[2] YAMADA T，HASHIMOTO R I，YAHATA N，et al.

Resting-State functional connectivity-based biomarkers

and functional MRI-based neurofeedback for psychiatric

disorders：a challenge for developing theranostic

biomarkers[J]. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol，2017，20（10）：

769-781.

[3] OWEN M J. New approaches to psychiatric diagnostic

classification[J]. Neuron，2014，84（3）：564-571.

[4] ZHANG P，WANG J，XU Q，et al. Altered functional

connectivity in post-ischemic stroke depression：a restingstate

functional magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Eur

J Radiol，2018，100：156-165.

[5] EGOROVA N，CUMMING T，SHIRBIN C，et al.

Lower cognitive control network connectivity in stroke participants with depressive features[J]. Transl

Psychiatry，2018，7（11）：4.

[6] PADMANABHAN J L，COOKE D，JOUTSA J，et al.

A human depression circuit derived from focal brain

lesions[J]. Biol Psychiatry，2019，86（10）：749-758.

[7] WU W，KELLER C J，ROGASCH N C，et al. ARTIST：

a fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for

single-pulse TMS-EEG data[J]. Hum Brain Mapp，

2018，39（4）：1607-1625.

[8] CHEN A C，OATHES D J，CHANG C，et al. Causal

interactions between fronto-parietal central executive

and default-mode networks in humans[J]. Proc Natl

Acad Sci USA，2013，110（49）：19944-19949.

[9] GREENBLATT R E，PFLIEGER M E，OSSADTCHI

A E. Connectivity measures applied to human brain

electrophysiological data[J]. J Neurosci Methods，2012，

207（1）：1-16.

[10] ZHANG P，XU Q，DAI J，et al. Dysfunction of

affective network in post ischemic stroke depression：a

resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging

study[J]. Biomed Res Int，2014，2014：846830.

[11] FOX M D. Mapping symptoms to brain networks with

the human connectome[J]. N Engl J Med，2018，379

（23）：2237-2245.

[12] WANG C，CHEN Y，ZHANG Y，et al. Quantitative

EEG abnormalities in major depressive disorder

with basal ganglia stroke with lesions in different

hemispheres[J]. J Affect Disord，2017，215：172-178.

[13] DORUK D，SIMIS M，IMAMURA M，et al.

Neurophysiologic correlates of post-stroke mood and

emotional control[J]. Front Hum Neurosci，2016，10：

428.

[14] SUN C C，YANG F，WANG C F，et al. Mutual

information-based brain network analysis in poststroke

patients with different levels of depression[J].

Front Hum Neurosci，2018，12：285.

[15] NEWSON J J，THIAGARAJAN T C. EEG frequency

bands in psychiatric disorders：a review of resting state

studies[J]. Front Hum Neurosci，2018，12：521.

[16] BRUNNER C，BILLINGER M，SEEBER M，et al.

Volume conduction influences scalp-based connectivity

estimates[J]. Front Comput Neurosci，2016，10：121.

[17] VAN DE STEEN F，FAES L，KARAHAN E，et al.

Critical comments on EEG sensor space dynamical

connectivity analysis[J]. Brain Topogr，2019，32（4）：

643-654.

[18] HASSAN M，WENDLING F. Electroencephalography

source connectivity：aiming for high resolution

of brain networks in time and space[J]. IEEE Signal

Processing Magazine，2018，35（3）：81-96.

[19] GRECH R，CASSAR T，MUSCAT J，et al. Review on

solving the inverse problem in EEG source analysis[J].

J Neuroeng Rehabil，2008，5：25.

[20] MICHEL C M，HE B. EEG source localization[J].

Handb Clin Neurol，2019，160：85-101.

[21] BIROT G，SPINELLI L，VULLIEMOZ S，et al. Head

model and electrical source imaging：a study of 38

epileptic patients[J]. Neuroimage Clin，2014，5：77-83.

[22] HASSAN M，DUFOR O，MERLET I，et al. EEG

source connectivity analysis：from dense array

recordings to brain networks[J/OL]. PLoS One，2014，

9（8）：e105041[2020-04-15]. https：//doi.org/10.1371/

journal.pone.0105041.

[23] TOLL R T，WU W，NAPARSTEK S，et al. An

electroencephalography connectomic profile of

posttraumatic stress disorder[J]. Am J Psychiatry，

2020，177（3）：233-243.

[24] DAUWELS J，VIALATTE F，MUSHA T，et al. A

comparative study of synchrony measures for the early

diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on EEG[J].

Neuroimage，2010，49（1）：668-693.

[25] NOLTE G，BAI O，WHEATON L，et al. Identifying

true brain interaction from EEG data using the

imaginary part of coherency[J]. Clin Neurophysiol，

2004，115（10）：2292-2307.

[26] HIPP J F，HAWELLEK D J，CORBETTA M，et

al. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of

spontaneous oscillatory activity[J]. Nat Neurosci，2012，

15（6）：884-890.

[27] XIA C H，MA Z，CIRIC R，et al. Linked dimensions

of psychopathology and connectivity in functional

brain networks[J]. Nat Commun，2018，9（1）：3003.

[28] ZHDANOV A，ATLURI S，WONG W，et al. Use of

machine learning for predicting escitalopram treatment

outcome from electroencephalography recordings in

adult patients with depression[J/OL]. JAMA Netw

Open，2020，3（1）：e1918377[2020-04-15]. https：//doi.

org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18377.

[29] TO W T，DE RIDDER D，HART J Jr，et al.

Changing brain networks through non-invasive

neuromodulation[J]. Front Hum Neurosci，2018，12：

128.