中国卒中杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (10): 849-854.

• 医管园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

小脑海绵状血管瘤合并发育性静脉畸形的手术策略研究

张培峰,曹勇,蔡楚伟,许海雄,王硕   

  1. 1汕头市中心医院外四科
    2首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-08 出版日期:2015-10-20 发布日期:2015-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 曹勇 caoyong6@aliyun.com

Surgical Strategy of Cerebellar Cavernous Malformations with Associated Developmental Venous Anomalies

  • Received:2015-04-08 Online:2015-10-20 Published:2015-10-20

摘要:

目的 探讨小脑海绵状血管瘤合并发育性静脉畸形时安全、有效的手术策略。 方法 回顾性分析首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院神经外科2009年2月至2012年4月收治的诊断为小 脑海绵状血管瘤合并发育性静脉畸形的患者12例。收集患者的流行病学特点、临床与影像学资料及 随访结果,并展开分析。 结果 男性、女性患者各6例,年龄12~72岁,中位年龄31.92岁,均以症状性脑出血起病。其中11例患 者接受手术治疗,1例患者拒绝手术自动出院。根据发育性静脉畸形的血管构筑形态将患者归纳为5 种模式:①静脉畸形引流静脉在海绵状血管瘤上方和(或)前方汇入直窦或Galen’s静脉的末端(3例 患者),后正中入路切除病灶。②静脉畸形引流静脉在海绵状血管瘤侧方汇入岩上窦(3例患者),乙 状窦后入路切除病灶。③静脉畸形引流静脉在海绵状血管瘤外侧方汇入同侧的乙状窦(2例患者), 后正中入路切除病灶。④静脉畸形引流静脉在海绵状血管瘤上方汇入横窦(2例患者),乙状窦后入 路切除病灶。⑤静脉畸形引流静脉在海绵状血管瘤的腹侧进入四脑室汇入室管膜静脉(2例患者), 后正中入路切除病灶。术后所有患者无急性脑出血或脑梗死,2例患者出现一过性脑水肿,其中1例 术后急诊行枕下减压术。所有手术患者在平均随访34.3个月内预后良好且无海绵状血管瘤复发。 结论 发育性静脉畸形的终末分支通常覆盖于小脑海绵状血管瘤的前上方,本研究中未发现发育性 静脉畸形的主干向下方扩展,手术以后正中入路,乙状窦后入路为主。该策略并未引起脑出血或脑梗 死等并发症。

文章导读: 小脑海绵状血管瘤合并发育性静脉畸形时其终末分支通常覆盖于小脑海绵状血管瘤的前上方,手术以后正中入路,乙状窦后入路为主。该策略并未引起脑出血或脑梗死等并发症。

关键词: 小脑海绵状血管瘤; 发育性静脉畸形; 血管构筑形态; 手术策略; 预后

Abstract:

Objective To investigate safe and effective surgical strategies in treatment to cerebellar cavernous malformations(CCMs) with associated developmental venous anomalies(DVAs). Methods A retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed as CCMs with associated DVAs admitted in Neurological Depart of Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University between February 2009 and April 2012. Epidemiological data, clinical data, radiographic images and follow up results were analyzed. Results Six male and six female patients were recruited in this study, aged from 12 to 72 years old, the mean age is 31.92 years old. All patients presented with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage from the onset. All patients underwent surgery, except for one refusing surgical treatment and then discharged from hospital. DVAs’ architecture is anatomically classified into five modes: (1)The trunks of DVAs passing over CCMs upward and/or forward to end in the straight sinus or Galen’s veins (three cases), suboccipital middle line approach is used. (2)The trunks of DVAs extend laterally from the side of CCMs to end in the superior petrosal sinuses (three cases), retrosigmoid approach is used for resection of the CCMs. (3)The trunks of the DVAs extended upward andentered the proximal transverse sinus (two cases),suboccipital middle line approach are used. (4)The trunks of the DVAs extended forward and laterally to the transverse sinus (two cases). Retrosigmoid approach is applied in surgery. (5)The trunks of the DVAs stride over CCMs ventrally to merge in the subverntricular veins at the fourth ventricle (two cases), suboccipital middle line approach is used. We did not find the trunk of DVAs draining into occipital sinus in any of the studied cases. No patients suffered post-operative cerebral hemorrhage or ischemia, two patients present with transient cerebral edema after surgery, in which 1 patient is gendered immediate suboccipital decompression. All patients have good prognosis and no recurrence of CCMs within a mean follow-up 34.3 months. Conclusion Distal radicles of DVAs always covered the anterior, superior, and medial aspects of CCMs. No trunk of DVAs extend downward. The safe and effective surgical approach included supoccipital midline approach, retrosigmoid approach. These treatment strategy did not cause any intracerebral hemorrhage, ischemia or other complications postoperatively.

Key words: Cerebellar cavernous malformations; Developmental venous anomalies; Angioarchitecture; Surgical strategy; Prognosis