中国卒中杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (11): 941-946.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

分支动脉粥样硬化病和腔隙性脑梗死临床差异meta分析

刘广志,曹江慧,梅斌,刘煜敏   

  1. 1 430071 武汉武汉大学中南医院神经内科
    2武汉大学中南医院影像科
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-26 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-11-20
  • 通讯作者: 梅斌 meibird@163.com

Meta Analysis for the Clinical Differences Between Branch Atheromatous Disease and Lacunar Infarction

  • Received:2015-03-26 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-11-20

摘要:

目的 比较分支动脉粥样硬化病(branch atheromatous disease,BAD)和腔隙性脑梗死(lacunar i nfarcti on,LI)之间的临床差异。 方法 检索国内外数据库,查找分支动脉粥样硬化病和腔隙性脑梗死相关文献,使用RevMan 5.2进 行数据处理,对文献进行meta分析。 结果 在中国人群中BAD患者年龄小于LI患者(MD -2.70,95%CI -4.29~-1.11,P<0.01);在日本 人群中BAD患者年龄大于LI患者(MD 2.58,95%CI 0.75~4.41,P<0.01)。BAD患者的高脂血症患病 率更高(OR 1.26,95%CI 1.03~1.55,P =0.03)。行敏感性分析后发现,BAD患者糖尿病(OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.02~1.61,P =0.03)、入院时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(national institutes of health stroke scale,NIHSS)评分(MD 0.76,95%CI 0.50~1.02,P<0.01)和预后情况(OR 0.54,95%CI 0.38~0.77, P<0.01)在BAD和LI患者之间存在差异性显著。 结论 BAD患者糖尿病、高脂血症发病率显著高于LI患者,其早期神经功能和预后情况均差于LI患者。 中国人群中BAD和LI患者的年龄分布特征与和日本人群相反。

文章导读: 通过meta分析发现分支动脉粥样硬化病合并糖尿病、高脂血症率高于腔隙性脑梗死,且二者在日本和中国人群中年龄分布存在差异。

关键词: 分支动脉粥样硬化病; 腔隙性脑梗死; 临床特征; meta分析

Abstract:

Objective To make a further comparison for the clinical differences between branch atheromatous disease(BAD) and lacunar infarction(LI). Methods We searched the Chinese and foreign language databases for relevant studies. Statistical analysis were performed by RevMan 5.2 software. Results In China, BAD patients were younger than LI patients(MD -2.70, 95%CI -4.29~-1.11, P <0.01); In Japan, BAD patients were older than LI patients(MD 2.58, 95%CI 0.75~4.41, P <0.01). Hyperlipidaemia affected more BAD patients(OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.03~1.55, P =0.03). After the sensitivity analysis, diabetes mellitus(OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.02~1.61, P =0.03), initial national institutes of health stroke scale(NIHSS score)(MD 0.76, 95%CI 0.50~1.02, P <0.01) and prognosis (OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.38~0.77, P <0.01) showed significant differences between BAD and LI. Conclusion Hyperlipidaemia and diabetes mellitus affected more BAD patients, compared to LI patients. The nerve functional and prognosis of BAD patients were worse than LI patients. The characteristic of age distribution in Chinese BAD and LI patients was contrary to Japanese.

Key words: Branch atheromatous disease; Lacunar infarction; Clinical characteristics; Metaanalysis